Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:03:55.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Path analysis: application in an epidemiological study of echinococcosis in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. J. Burridge
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
C. W. Schwabe
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The method of path analysis is described in detail. Application of this analytical technique in the interpretation of causal relationships in complex biological systems is demonstrated using data from an epidemiological study of echinococcosis in New Zealand. The results identified the major causal pathways determining Echinococcus granulosus prevalence in dogs, based on multiple regression analysis of a linear causal model constructed from prior biological and epidemiological knowledge. Only ethnic and sheep husbandry variables had important direct effects on prevalence in the North Island of New Zealand, with some climatic factors (maximum temperature and relative humidity) and soil porosity acting indirectly through animal husbandry practices. It is suggested that path analysis, by permitting interaction between epidemiological theory and statistical analysis, provides a valuable additional tool to epidemiologists for the study of causal relationships among variables in multivariate systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Alwin, D. F. & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review 40, 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, M. J. & Schwabe, C. W. (1977 a). Hydatid disease in New Zealand: an epidemiological study of transmission among Maoris. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 26, (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burridge, M. J. & Schwabe, C. W. (1977 b). Epidemiological analysis of factors influencing rate of progress in Echinococcus granulosus control in New Zealand. Journal of Hygiene 78, 151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burridge, M. J. & Schwabe, C. W. (1977 c). Epidemiological analysis of factors influencing the increase in Taenia ovis prevalence during the New Zealand Echinococcus granulosus control program. Australian Veterinary Journal 53, (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burridge, M. J., Schwabe, C. W. & Fraser, J. (1977). Hydatid disease in New Zealand: changing patterns of human infection, 1878–1972. New Zealand Medical Journal 85, (In the Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Colli, C. W. & Williams, J. F. (1972). Influence of temperature on the infectivity of eggs of Echinococcus granulosus in laboratory rodents. Journal of Parasitology 58, 422–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology 72, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1958). Arecoline hydrobromide as a taeniafuge in dogs, with special reference to its use in controlling hydatid disease. Australian Veterinary Journal 34, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1968). The Styx field-trial: a study on the application of control measures against hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 73100.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1973). Surveillance of Echinococcus granulosus in dogs with arecoline hydrobromide. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 649–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, J. R. & Berglund, K. (1974). Epidemiological approach to multiple factor interactions in pulmonary disease: the potential usefulness of path analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 221, 361–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, G. G. (1973). A survey of tapeworms in rural dogs in Tasmania. Australian Veterinary Journal 49, 273–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heise, D. R. (1969). Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In Sociological Methodology(ed. Borgatta, E. F.), pp. 3873. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Ineson, M. J. (1954). A comparison of the parasites of wild and domestic pigs in New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 82, 579609.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. J. & Arundel, J. H. (1971). The incidence of tapeworms in rural dogs in Victoria. Australian Veterinary Journal 47, 4653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalimo, E. & Bice, T. W. (1973). Causal analysis and ecological fallacy in cross-national epidemiological research. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1, 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laing, A. D. M. G. (1961). The implementation of hydatid eradication measures in New Zealand. Bulletin de l'office International des Epizooties 56, 1030–9.Google Scholar
Land, K. C. (1969). Principles of path analysis. In Sociological Methodology(ed. Borgatta, E. F.), pp. 337. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Laws, G. F. (1968). Physical factors influencing survival of taeniid eggs. Experimental Parasitology 22, 227–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ross, I. C. (1929). Observations on the hydatid parasite (Echinococcus granulosus) and the control of hydatid disease in Australia. Bulletin of the Commonwealth of Australia Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, no. 40. Melbourne: H. J. Green.Google Scholar
Schwase, C. W. (1969). Veterinary Medicine And Human Health, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1962). Wild animals in New Zealand as hosts of Echinococcus granulosus and other taeniid tapeworms. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand (Zoology) 2, 221–50.Google Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1963). Survival of Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia hydatigena eggs in two extreme climatic regions of New Zealand. Research in Veterinary Science 4, 199216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodzicki, K. A. (1950). Introduced mammals of New Zealand: an ecological and economic survey. Bulletin of the New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, no. 98.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 557–85.Google Scholar