Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:20:09.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Part I. Historical Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

That out breaks of plague are associated with a more or less simultaneous mortality amongst rats is an observation of great antiquity. After the discovery of the bacillus by Yersin and Kitasato this concomitant disease of rats was identified as plague, and during the last twelve years the association of rat plague and human plague has been shown to be almost invariable. The relationship has been so striking that many observers who have studied the question on the spot, e.g. Yersin, Ogata, Simond, Thompson, Koch, Gaffky and many others, have arrived at the opinion that from an epidemiological point of view one must regard plague as essentially a rat-disease in which human beings may participate.

Type
I. Experiments upon the transmission of plague by fleas
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 6 , Issue 4: Extra “Plague Number” , September 1906 , pp. 425 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

References

Baxter-Tyrie, C. C. (1905), Report of an outbreak of Plague in Queensland during the first six months of 1904. Journ. of Hygiene, vol. V. p. 313.Google Scholar
Blackmore, G. J. (1902), Rats and Plague. Lancet, II. p. 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (1900), Les puces des rats et des souris jouent-elles un rôle important dans la transmission de la peste bubonique à l'homme? Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Pt. I, vol. XXVII. p. 1.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B., (1902), The part played by the fleas of rats and mice in the transmission of Bubonic plague. Journ. Trop. Med. vol. V. p. 33.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (1903), Les nouvelles recherches sur l'action des puces des rats et des souris dans la transmission de la peste bubonique. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., Ref. vol. XXXIII. p. 753.Google Scholar
Gauthier, and Raybaud, (1902), Sur le rôle des parasites du rat dans la transmission de la peste. Compt. Rend. Heb. de la Soc. de Biol. vol. LIV. p. 1497.Google Scholar
Gauthier, and Raybaud, (1903), Recherches experimentales sur le rôle des parasites du rat dans la transmission de la peste. Revue d' Hygiène, vol. XXV. p. 426.Google Scholar
German Plague Commission, Report of (1899). Arbeiten aus dem Kaiserl Gesundheitsamte, vol. XVI. p. 1.Google Scholar
Hankin, E. H. (1898), La propagation de la Peste. Ann. de l' Inst. Pasteur, vol. XII. p. 705.Google Scholar
Hankin, E. H. (1905), On the epidemiology of Plague. Journ. of. Hygiene, vol. V. p. 79.Google Scholar
Herzog, M. (1904), The Plague: bacteriology, morbid anatomy, including a consideration of insects as plague carriers. Bulletin of Manila, 25483, p. 82.Google Scholar
Herzog, M. (1905), Zur Frage der Pestverbreitung durch Insecten. Zeitscher. f. Hygiene, vol. LI. p. 269.Google Scholar
Hill, E. (1904), Report on the Plague in Natal, 1902—3, p. 40, also Appendix B to same.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. (1904), A Research into Epidemic and Epizootic Plague. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. (1905), The Spread of Plague infection by Insects. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., Orig. vol. XL. p. 54.Google Scholar
James, C. H. (1899), Report on the outbreak of Plague in the Jullundur and Hoshiarpur Districts of the Punjab, 1897—1898.Google Scholar
Kolle, W. (1901), Berichte über die Thätigkeit in der zu Studien über Pest eingerichteten Station des Institus für Infectionskrankheiten, 1899—1900. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, vol. XXXVI. p. 411.Google Scholar
Kister and Schumacher (1905), Untersuchung von pestverdächtigen Ratten aus Schiffen. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, vol. LI. p. 139.Google Scholar
Liston, W. G. (1905), Plague, rats, and fleas. Journ. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. vol. XVI. p. 253, also Published as a separate pamphlet (enlarged by Thacher, Spink & Co., Calcutta, 1905.)Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. A. (1906), Bubonic Plague in Cape Colony. Journ. of the Roy. Army Med. Corps, vol. V. p. 291.Google Scholar
Noc, F. (1905), Du rôle des puces dans la propagation de la peste; état actuel de la question. Arch. de Parasitol. vol. Ix. p. 300.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1897), Zur Aufklärung der Rolle welche die Insekten bei der Verbreitung der Pest spielen. Ueber die Empfindlichkeit verschiedener Tiere für dieselbe. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. vol. XXII. p. 87.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1899), On the rôle of insects, arachnids and myriapods as carriers in the spread of bacterial and parasitic diseases of man and animals. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Repts. vol. VIII. p. 15.Google Scholar
Ogata, M. (1897), Ueber die Pestepidemie in Formosa. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. vol. XXI. p. 774.Google Scholar
Pearse, T. F. (1905), Report on Plague in Calcutta, 1903—04. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Simond, P. L. (1898), La propagation de la Peste. Ann. de I'inst. Pasteur, vol. XII. p. 625.Google Scholar
Simpson, W. J. (1903), Report on the causes and continuance of Plague in Hong Kong, p. 56.Google Scholar
Snow, P. C. H. (1897), Report on the Outbreak of Bubonic Plague in Bombay.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (1900), Report on an Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1900.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (1903), Report on a second Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1902.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (1904), Report on a third Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1903.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (1904), Report on a fourth Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1904.Google Scholar
Tidswell, F. (1900), Appendix (A) to Report on Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, by A. Thompson, 1900, p. 56.Google Scholar
Tidswell, F. (1903), Report on a second Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1902, by A. Thompson, p. 71.Google Scholar
Tiraboschi, C. (1903), Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Pestepidemiologie. Arch. f. Hygiene, vol. XLVI. p. 251.Google Scholar
Tiraboschi, C. (1904), Les rats, les souris et leurs parasites cutanés dans leurs rapports avec la propagation de la peste bubonique. Arch. d. Parasitol. vol. VIII. p. 161.Google Scholar
Yersin (1894), La Peste Bubonique à Hong Kong. Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, vol. VIII. p. 666.Google Scholar
Zirolia, G. (1902), Der Pestbacillus im Organismus der Flöhe. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., Orig. vol. XXXI. p. 686.Google Scholar