Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:27:47.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oral dose and faecal concentration of antibiotics during antibiotic decontamination in mice and in a patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. van der Waaij ,
J.M. Berghuis-de Vries  and
C. Korthals Altes
D. van der Waaij
Affiliation:
Radiobiological Institute TNO, Rijswijk (Z.H.)
J.M. Berghuis-de Vries
Affiliation:
Radiobiological Institute TNO, Rijswijk (Z.H.)
C. Korthals Altes
Affiliation:
Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In both mice and one patient, a similar correlation was found between the oral dose of a ‘nonabsorbable’;aminoglycoside antibiotic selected for antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract and the resultant faecal concentration. In mice, absorption of the orally-given antibiotics could only be demonstrated in animals treated with extremely high doses of 1440 mg. per kg. body weight per day. Evidence of absorption of gentamycin was found to occur in a patient after doses as low as 70 mg. per kg. per day.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 197 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Bodey, G. P., Loftis, J. & Bowen, E. (1968). Effect of a prophylactic antibiotic regimen on the microbial flora of patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Archives of Internal Medicine 122, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, I. (1958). Kanamycin for bowel sterilization. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 76, 212.Google Scholar
Goss, W. A. & Cimyotti, E. B. (1968). Evaluation of an automatic diluting device for microbiological applications. Applied Microbiology 16, 1414.Google Scholar
Gunn, A. A. & Gould, J. C. (1965). Control of the intestinal flora by means of antibacterial drugs in surgery of the colon. Gut 6, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilmeyer, W. (1965). Streptomycin und Dihydrostreptomycin, p. 181; Kanamycin, Neomycin, Paromycin, p. 334; Weitere Antibiotika, p.460. In:Antibiotika Fibel; Antibiotika und Chemotherapie, Stuttgart. Georg Thieme Verlag.Google Scholar
Hendriks, W. D. H., van der Waaij, D., Korthals Altes, C., Bekghuis, J. M., Lekker kerk, J. E., & de Vast, J. (1974). Elimination of the gastrointestinal microflora in monkeys with nonabsorbable antibiotics. In Clinical Use of Combinations of Antibiotics. London, University Press. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Preisler, H. D., Goldstein, I. M. & Henderson, E. S. (1970). Gastrointestinal 'sterilization'in the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. Cancer 26, 1076.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. A. & Perry, S. (1966). Patient protection in cancer chemotherapy. Journal of the American Medical Association 197, 623.Google Scholar
van der Waaij, D., De Vries, J. M. & Lekkerkerk, J. E. C. (1970). Eliminating bacteria from monkeys with antibiotics. In: Infections and Immunosuppression in Subhuman Primates, p. 21. Copenhagen, Munksgard.Google Scholar
van der Waaij, D. & Andreas, A. H. (1971). Prevention of airborne contamination and cross-contamination in germfree-mice by laminar flow. Journal of Hygiene 69, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Waaij, D., Vossen, J. M. & Korthals Altes, C. (1973). Patient isolators designed in the Netherlands. In: Germfree Research, p. 31. New York and London, Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. C., Herrmann, J. B. & Shadomy, S. (1964). Oral neomycin and healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surgery Gynecology and Obstretics 119, 799.Google Scholar