Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:58:17.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimum moving averages for the estimation of median effective dose in bioassay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

B. M. Bennett
B. M. Bennett
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Optimum forms of moving averages are derived for the estimation of LD 50 in the situation where no assumptions are made about the form of the dose-response distribution. The theory is also applied to uses of moving averages based on the angular transformation of the percentage response. A numerical example illustrates this application, and its results are compared with the corresponding probit and logit estimates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , December 1963 , pp. 401 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

Bennett, B. M. (1952). Estimation of LD 50 by moving averages. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 157–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkson, J. (1953). A statistically precise and relatively simple method of estimating the bio-assay with quantal response, based on the logistic function. J. Amer. statist. Ass. 48, 565–99.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1947). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1952). Statistical Method in Biological Assay. Griffin and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edition. Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. (1947). Use of moving averages and interpolation to estimate median-effective dose. Bact. Rev. 11, 115–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed