Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:56:14.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Protective Substances of Immune Sera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. W. Ainley Walker
E. W. Ainley Walker
Affiliation:
Radcliffe Travelling Fellow in the University of Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The theories of Ehrlich on the Substances and Mechanisms concerned in the production of Immunity have opened up a very wide field for speculation and research. His view on the formation of the Antitoxins forms the most satisfactory and useful hypothesis which has been produced upon this subject, and is constantly receiving fresh support from the accumulating evidence of numerous observers. But of the more recent developments of his theories as applied to antimicrobic agencies some of the details appear to be at present insufficiently established. With certain of these details it is here proposed to deal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1902 , pp. 85 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

References

(1)Ehrlich, , Mode d'Action et Mécanisme de Production des Antitoxins, d'après le professeur P. Ehrlich. Extrait de la Semaine Médicale, Paris, 6 décembre 1899Google Scholar
Ehrlich, , Trans. Jenner Inst. London, 1899, Vol. II. p. 1Google Scholar
Ehrlich, , Croonian Lectures vol. lxvi. p. 424Google Scholar
Ehrlich, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Leipzig, Bd. XVII. pp. 3, 976, 1218.Google Scholar
Ehrlich Und, Morgenroth, Berl. klin. Wochenschr. 1899, 26 Jahrg., No. 1, p. 6; No. 22, p. 481, also 1900, 29 Jahrg., No. 21, p. 453.Google Scholar
(2)Roux, Vaillard, and Annales de l'Inst. Past. Paris, 1893, VII. p. 65.Google Scholar
(3)Ainley, Walker, Journ. Path. and Bact. Edin. and Lond., 1901, vol. VII. p. 278.Google Scholar
(4)Wassermann, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1900, 26 Jahrg., No. 18, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Borget, , Annales de JInst. Past. Paris, 1895, IX. p. 504, and 1896, X. p. 214.Google Scholar
(6)Hahh, , Archiv für Hygiene, 1895, Bd. XXV. pp. 129, 131.Google Scholar
(7)Denys Et, Havet, La Cellule, 1894, X. p. 7Google Scholar
Havet, , La Cellule, 1894, X. p. 221Google Scholar
Denys Et, Leclef, La Cellule, 1895, XI. p. 175.Google Scholar
(8)Deutsch, , Annales de l'Inst. Past. Paris, 1899, XIII. p. 689.Google Scholar
(9)Von, Dungern, München. med. Wochenschr., 1900, Bd. XLVII. No. 20.Google Scholar
(10)Bulloch, , Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., Parasitenkunde u. Infektionskrankh., 1900, Bd. XXIX. p. 724.Google Scholar
(11)Funck, , La sérothérapie de la fièvre typhoide. Henri Lamertin, Bruxelles, 1896.Google Scholar