Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:34:33.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Occurrence of the Micrococcus catarrhalis in Normal and Catarrhal Noses and its Differentiation from other Gram-negative Cocci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Arkwright
J. A. Arkwright
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Micrococcus catarrhalis was first isolated by Kirchner (1890) from cases of influenza-like illness. Since then several epidemics of acute catarrh and bronchitis associated with this organism have been recorded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1907 , pp. 145 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1907

References

REFERENCES

Andrewes, F. W. (1906). A case of Acute Meningococcal Septicaemia. Lancet, Vol. I. p. 1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezançon, F. and de Jong, S. I. (1905). Charactères bactériologiques des crachats au cours de l'épidémie actuelle dite de Grippe. Bull. et Mém. Soc. Méd. des Hôp. de Paris, Vol. XXII. p. 165.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, A. and França, C. (1902). Ueber die Meningitis cerebrospinalis epidemica und ihren specifischen Erreger. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infections-kr. Vol. XLVI. p. 463.Google Scholar
Dunham, E. K. (II. 1906). Comparative studies of Diplococci decolorised by Gram's method, obtained from the Spinal Fluid and from the Nares of cases of Epidemic Cerebrospinal Meningitis. Journ. Infect. Diseases, Suppl. No. 2, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, R. A. and Gordon, M. H. (1905). On the Clinical and Bacteriological Aspects of an Epidemic simulating Influenza. Brit. Med. Journ. Vol. II. p. 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghon, A., Pfeiffer, H. and Sederl, H. (1902). Der Micrococcus catarrhalis (R. Pfeiffer) als Krankheitserreger. Zeitschr. f. klin. Med. Vol. XLIV. p. 262.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. E. and von Sholly, A. I. (ii. 1906). The frequent occurrence of Meningococci in the Nasal Cavities of Meningitis patients and those in direct contact with them. Journ. Infect. Diseases, Suppl. No. 2. p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, M. (1890). Bacteriologische Untersuchungen über Influenza. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene und Infectionskrankheiten, Vol. IX. p. 528.Google Scholar
Kolle, W. and Wassermann, A. (1906). Untersuchungen über Meningokokken. Klin. Jahrb. Vol. XV. p. 507.Google Scholar
Kutscher, K. H. (1906). Ueber Untersuchungen der Nasenrachenhöhle gesunder Menschen auf Meningococcen. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
v. Lingelsheim, W. (1906). Die bakteriologischen Arbeiten der Königl. Hygienischen Station zu Beuthen in O.-Schl. während der Genickstarre Epidemic im Winter 1904–5. Klin. Jahrb. Vol. xv. p. 373.Google Scholar
Neisser, M. (1903). Micrococcus catarrhalis. In Kolle and Wassermann's Handb. d. pathogenen Mikroorganismen, Vol. III. p. 146.Google Scholar
Schiff, A. (1898). Ueber das Vorkommen des Meningococcus intracellularis (Weichselbaum) in der Nasenhöhle nicht-meningitiskranker Individuen. Centralbl. f. Inn. Med. Vol. XIX. p. 577.Google Scholar
Weichselbaum, A. and Ghon, A. (1905). Der Micrococcus meningitidis cerebrospinalis als Erreger von Endokarditis sowie sein Vorkommen in der Nasenhöhle Gesunder u. Kranker. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. Vol. XVIII. p. 625.Google Scholar