Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:59:36.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fungi causing Ringworm in Children attending London Country Council Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. G. Hare  and
P. Tate
J. G. Hare
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, Cambridge.
P. Tate
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, Cambridge.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Cultures were obtained from 69 cases of ringworm of children in London County Council Schools.

2. Three of them were cases of favus, the parasite in each case being Achoroion Schōnleinii.

3. Microsporums are responsible for most of the ringworm, and were isolated from 54 of the 69 cases, or 78 per cent. Microsporum audouini was found in 70 per cent, of the Microsporum infections; M. lanosum and M. felineum each in one case; and 4 other cultures were obtained, comprising 3 species which have not yet been identified.

4.Endothrix Trichophytons were found in 17 per cent, of the cases and include the species Trichophyton crateriforme, T. sulfureum, T. acuminatum and T. violaceum.

5.A list of the species isolated arranged, according to the new classification of Ota and Langeron, is given.

6.The results are compared with those previously obtained in London by Fox and Blaxall, and Adamson, with which they broadly agree.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , November 1927 , pp. 32 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, H. G. (July, 1895). Observations on the Parasites of Ringworm. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8. 201–211.Google Scholar
Adamson, H. G. (August, 1895). Observations on the Parasites of Ringworm. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8, 237–244.Google Scholar
Fox, T. C. (1908). Further Contribution to the Study of the Endothrix Trichophyta Florain London. Proc. Roy. soc. med. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Fox, T. C. (1897). The Biology of Ringworm. Brit. Med. Journ. 2, 867.Google Scholar
Fox, T. C. and Blaxall, F. R. (July, 1896). An Inquiry into the Plurality of Fungi Causing Ringworm in Human Beings as met with in London. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8, No. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, T. C. and Blaxall, F. R. (August, 1896). An Inquiry into the Plurality of Fungi Causing Ringworm in Human Beings as met with in London. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8, No. 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, T. C. and Blaxall, F. R. (September, 1896). An Inquiry into the Plurality of Fungi Causing Ringworm in Human Beings as met with in London. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8, No. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, T. C. and Blaxall, F. R. (October, 1896). An Inquiry into the Plurality of Fungi Causing Ringworm in Human Beings as met with in London. Brit. Journ. Dermat. 8, No. 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langekon, M. (1925). Précis de Microscopic. 4th edition. Paris: Masson and Cie.Google Scholar
Ota, M. and Langeron, M. (1923). Nouvelle Classification des Dermatophytes. Ann. Parasit. Humaine et Comparée, 1, 305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabouraud, R. (1910). Les Teignes. Paris: Masson and Cie.Google Scholar