Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2009
In the first place cultures of the nitroso-bacterium were developed in inorganic solutions. These carried to a 5th dilution exhibited practically a pure culture of this species.
Secondly, cultures of the nitroso-bacterium were inoculated into solutions containing small quantities of organic matter. In these they were able to oxidise the ammonia present. It was found that a culture developing in the presence of small quantities of organic matter was better able to oxidise the ammonia in higher percentages of organic matter than a culture taken directly from an inorganic solution.
In growing this species on plates silica jelly has the disadvantage of being difficult to prepare. It was 18 months before I obtained a satisfactory plate. This jelly grows the nitroso-bacterium well, but other species can also develop colonies on it. Ammonia agar also grows the species, as shown by the oxidation of the ammonia, and the colonies assume a characteristic form.
As to beef broth agar and gelatine, these media grew colonies of a micro-organism similiar to the nitroso-bacterium from oxidised ammonia cultures. Pieces of these plates containing such colonies in pure culture frequently oxidised ammonia in solutions. On the other hand pieces of such plates showing no colonies never produced any oxidations of the ammonia. Furthermore the single colonies from silica and ammonia agar plates, which oxidised the ammonia in the media into which they were sub-cultured, grew well on beef broth agar and gelatine.
From the above results I have come to the following conclusions:
(1) That the nitroso-bacterium grows well on any ordinary medium.
(2) That the supposed parallel organism is no other than the nitroso-bacterium itself.
(3) That in the presence of large percentages of organic matter the nitroso-bacterium, although growing very profusely, loses for a time the power of converting ammonia into a nitrite.
page 364 note 1 Comptes Rendus, vols. 84, 85, 86, and 89.Google Scholar
page 364 note 2 S. Chem. Soc. 08. 1888.Google Scholar
page 364 note 3 Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. 47, S. 296, 1890.Google Scholar
page 364 note 4 Annales de lInstitut Pasteur, nos. 4, 5, and 12, 1890; and Archiv des Sciences Biologique, St Petersburg, 1892.Google Scholar
page 365 note 1 Centralblatt für Bakteriologie, Abt. II. Band 11, no. 4, 1896.Google Scholar
page 365 note 2 Centralblatt für Bakteriologie, Abt. II. Band 5, no. 12, 1899.Google Scholar