Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:30:23.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Methods of measuring Skin Temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. Bedford  and
C. G. Warner
T. Bedford
Affiliation:
Investigators to the Industrial Health Research Board.
C. G. Warner
Affiliation:
Investigators to the Industrial Health Research Board.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the measurement of the temperature of exposed skin surfaces, we have reached the conclusion that the most accurate instrument is a radiation thermopile suitably screened from the effects of wind. As the thermopile does not actually touch the skin it does not interfere with the cutaneous circulation; neither does it hinder the heat-loss from the skin surface. Readings are simply and rapidly made; with the Moll thermopile and the Cambridge unipivot galvanometer used by us a reading can be taken in 4–6 sec. The readings are not influenced by wind if the thermopile is screened, and as the temperatures are measured as differences from that of a blackened surface of known temperature, change of air temperature does not upset the results. The apparatus is easily portable.

By rolling a mercury thermometer over a small area of skin the temperature can be estimated with but very slight error. This method is a reliable one for use where other apparatus is not available; but, it has the disadvantage that each observation takes from 1 to 1½ min. Accurate estimates cannot be obtained by this method in the special cases when the skin temperature is subject to rapid variation.

Under steady conditions accurate estimates can also be made by means of a clinical thermometer protected by a cork wedge, but each observation takes from 4 to 5 min.

Of the types of thermo-junction tested by us the simple Lewis type of junction attached and protected by a strip of surgical tape appears to give the most accurate results. The average error, taking the thermopile values as standard, was only 0·5–0·8° C, and the thermo-junction temperatures were consistently higher than the thermopile values by about this amount.

The Benedict type of junction also gives results which compare reasonably well with those obtained from radiation measurements. In our observations the average error with this type of junction was 0·7–1·3° C, and the error usually had the effect of giving too high a value for the thermo-j unction temperature. Other observers, however, have measured temperatures with this type of junction which appear to be somewhat low, and it appears possible that the temperature of the observer's hand may have influenced the readings obtained.

Forms of apparatus in which the thermo-junction and its leads are exposed to the effects of the air are liable to give very erroneous estimates of skin temperature. In our own comparisons the skin temperature was underestimated by 3–3·5° C. when the Strauss thermo-junction was used; and examples have been drawn from the literature which suggest that, with other apparatus in which the junction was exposed, the temperature was underestimated. If such forms of apparatus are used for measuring skin temperatures beneath the clothing, they may yield fairly reliable results, but in exposed positions considerable errors may arise. This liability to error is particularly serious where there is a wide range of air temperature and of air movement.

Skin temperatures can be measured with considerable accuracy by means of an electrical resistance thermometer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1934 , pp. 81 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, L. B. (1928). A study of body radiation. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 81, No. 6, Pub. No. 2980.Google Scholar
Bahey, N. P. (1932). The measurement of surface temperatures. Mech. Eng. 54, 553.Google Scholar
Journ. of Hyg. xxxiv 7Google Scholar
Benedict, F. G. (1925). Die Temperatur der menschlichen Haut. Ergebn. der Physiol. 24, 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, F. G., Coropatchinsky, V. and Finn, M. D. (1929). Measurement of the skin temperature of humans. Leopoldina (Amerikaband), 4, 129.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, J. J., Ives, J. E. and Britten, R. H. (1930). Effect of radiant energy on the skin temperatures of a group of steel workers. U.S. Pub. Health Repts. 45, 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnenkamp, H. and Pasquay, W. (1931). Untersuchungen zu den Grundlagen des Energie- und Stoffwechsels. III. Ein neuer Weg zur Bestimmung der für die Wärme-strahlung massgebenden Oberfläche des Menschen. Die “mittlere Strahlungstemperatur” des Menschen und seiner Kleideroberfläche. Pflügers Arch. 228, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. A. and Angus, T. C. (1928). Physiologic reactions of resting subjects to cooling power and effective temperature. J. Industr. Hyg. 10, 331.Google Scholar
Cobet, R. and Bramigk, F. (1924). Über Messung der Wärmestrahlung der menschlichen Haut und ihre klinische Bedeutung. Deutsches Arch. f. klin. Med. 144, 45.Google Scholar
Colburn, A. P. and Hougen, O. A. (1930). Studies in heat transmission. I. Measurement of fluid and surface temperatures. Ind. and Eng. Chem. 22, 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy, J. (1814). An account of some experiments on arterial heat. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 104, 590.Google Scholar
Kunkel, A. J. (1889). Ueber die Temperatur der menschlichen Haut. Zeitschr. f. Biol. 25, 55.Google Scholar
Lange, B. (1921). Über den Einfluss bewegter Luft auf das thermische Verhalten des Menschen. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infekt. 91, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. (1930). Observations upon the reactions of the vessels of the human skin to cold. Heart, 15, 177.Google Scholar
Liese, W. (1930). Hauttemperaturmessungen am ruhenden und arbeitenden Menschen unter dem Einfluss schwacher Luftströme. Arch. f. Hyg. 104, 24.Google Scholar
Miura, U. (1931). The effect of variations in relative humidity upon skin temperature and sense of comfort. Amer. J. Hyg. 13, 432.Google Scholar
Oehler, J. (1904). Über die Hauttemperatur des gesunden Menschen. Deutsches Arch. f. klin. Med. 80, 245.Google Scholar
Othmer, D. F. and Coats, H. B. (1928). Measurement of surface temperature. Ind. and Eng. Chem. 20, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. and Heymann, B. (1907). Untersuchungen über die Wirkungen kli-matischer Faktoren auf den Menschen. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infekt. 57, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. N. (1891). On the conditions which affect the loss of heat by radiation from the animal body. Studies from the Physiol. Lab. of Owens College, Manchester, 1, 101.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. N. (1930). Measurement of the temperature of the skin. Arch. Internat. de Pharmacod. et de Thérapie, 38, 444.Google Scholar
Strauss, W. (1928). Ein neues Thermoelement für Hauttemperaturmessungen. Klin. Wochenschr. 7, 1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, W. and Schwarz, S. (1932). Die Wirkung abgestufter Windgeschwindigkeiten auf die Hauttemperatur des ruhenden Menschen bei verschiedenen Temperatur- und Feuchtigkeitsgraden der Luft. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infekt. 114, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, H. M., Bedford, T. and Warner, C. G. (1930). A study of heating and ventilation in schools. Indust. Health Res. Bd. Rept. No. 58.Google Scholar
Vernon, H. M. and Warner, C. G. (1932). The influence of the humidity of the air on capacity for work at high temperatures. J. Hygiene, 32, 431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, E. F. (1930). The measurement of skin temperature in its relation to the sensation of comfort. Amer. J. Hyg. 12, 130.Google Scholar
Winslow, C.-E. A. and Greenburg, L. (1932). Vasomotor reactions to localised drafts. Amer. J. Hyg. 15, 1.Google Scholar