Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T15:22:15.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On diphtheria immunity in North Greenland 1932–33

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Krogh-Lund
Affiliation:
From the National Health Service of Denmark and the State Serum Institute, Copenhagen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. 304 natives of North-west Greenland were examined with standardized Schick toxin, and 139 with direct smears stained by the methods of Gram and Bie.

2. Of these 98 gave positive, 143 negative, and 63 doubtful reactions to the Schick test. 51 showed a positive control reaction with heated toxin. The swabs from 11 persons showed rods resembling the diphtheria bacillus.

3. We incline to the belief, also held by Wells & Heinbecker, that the most natural explanation of the existence of this large number of Schick-negative reactors in Eskimos and Greenlanders, is that diphtheria bacilli not in frequently occur in their throats, occasionally causing “angina” epidemics. Owing to the difficulty of bacteriological investigation in those latitudes, especially in performing fermentation and virulence tests upon the isolated strains, it has mostly been impossible to trace the aetiology of these epidemics to diphtheria bacilli.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

References

REFERENCES

Bay-Schmidt, (1929). Klin. Woch. No. 21, 974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinbecker, & Irving-Jones, (1928). J. Immun. 15, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Claus (1933). Die intrakutane Kaninchenmethode zur Auswertung von Diphtherietoxin und Antitoxin. Levin & Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wells, & Heinbecker, (1931). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. & Med. 28, 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, & Heinbecker, (1932 a). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. & Med. 29, 1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, & Heinbecker, (1932 b). J. Infect. Dis. 50, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar