Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:15:06.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The occurrence of natural antibodies in rabbit sera in relation to the paracolon group of organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Herta Schwabacher
Herta Schwabacher
Affiliation:
N.W. Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board, Group G Laboratory, Watford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Naturally occurring agglutinins to paracolon bacilli have been found in seven out of ten sera from non-immunized rabbits and in one anti-Salmonella and two anti-paracolon immune rabbits' sera after complete absorption with the immunizing strain.

2. The a antigen of Stamp & Stone, which is known to occur as a natural agglutinin, has been demonstrated in one out of nine paracolon bacilli.

3. Rabbits which before immunization show agglutinins to the immunizing strain or to an α antigen should not be used for the preparation of diagnostic antisera for intestinal Gram-negative bacilli.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1949 , pp. 115 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

References

REFERENCES

Emslie-Smith, A. H., (1948). J. Path. Bact. 60, 307.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, R. W., (1945). Proc. Ass. Clin. Path. 07 p. 17.Google Scholar
Francis, A. E., (1944). Army Path. Lab. Serv. Curr. Notes, 12, 62.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F., (1937). Z. Hyg. InfektKr. 119, 352.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F., (1941). Acta path, microbiol. scand. 18, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, F., (1944a). Acta path, microbiol. scand. 21, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, F., (1944b). Acta path, microbiol. scand. 21, 46.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F., (1944c). Acta path, microbiol. scand. 21, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, R., (1934). J. comp. Path. 47, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, A. I., (1943). Mon. Bull. E.P.H.L.S. 2, 7.Google Scholar
Peluffo, C. A., Edward, P. C., & Brunner, D. W., (1942). J. Infect. Dis. 70, 185.Google Scholar
Schiff, F., Bornstein, S., & Saphra, I., (1941). J. Immunol. 40, 365.Google Scholar
Schwabacher, H., (1949). J. Path. Bact. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Sevitt, S., (1945). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 37.Google Scholar
Stamp, , Lord, & Stone, D. M., (1944). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 266.Google Scholar
Wheeler, K. M., Stuart, C. A., & Ewing, W. H., (1946). J. Bact. 51, 169.Google Scholar
Wheeler, K. M., Stuart, C. A., Rustigan, R., & Bormann, E. K., (1943). J. Immunol. 47, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar