Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:45:45.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the war-time health of women in industry and at home: A comparative survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Dagmar C. Wilson
Affiliation:
From the Division of Nutrition, Lister Institute, and the Institute of Social Medicine, Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Clinical examination of 374 industrial women workers and 289 housewives of comparable type was made in Oxfordshire in August 1942 and repeated four times subsequently on the same groups up to March 1944.

2. It was concluded that the diet of these women was adequate to prevent obvious signs of vitamin deficiency but that there was a general tendency for the general nutritional state, assessed clinically, to deteriorate during the 19 months of this study. This deterioration was associated with complaint of fatigue.

3. The women workers residing in areas where the water was low in iodine content tended to show enlargement of the thyroid gland. The enlargement increased in those already affected, and the incidence also increased.

The author is much indebted to Dr J. O. Irwin for his assistance in statistical presentation of the data and to Dr Harriette Chick for helpful criticism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

References

Board of Education (1937). Ann. Rep. Chief Med. Offr, p. 19.Google Scholar
Bromehead, C. N., Murray, M. M. & Wilson, D. C. (1943). Lancet, 1, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goitre Sub-committee, Memorandum, Medical Research Council (1944). Lancet, 1, 107.Google Scholar
Industrial Health Research Board (1944). Pamphlet no. 2. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. C. (1943). Lancet, 2, 692.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. C. & Widdowson, E. M. (1942) Indian Med. Res. Mem. no. 34.Google Scholar
Wright, R. E. (1931). Lancet, 1, 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar