Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:10:59.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Negative impact of clinical misdiagnosis of measles on health workers' confidence in measles vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2004

R. F. HELFAND
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
T. CHIBI
Affiliation:
Formerly, Masters of Public Health Student, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
R. BIELLIK
Affiliation:
WHO Sub-Regional Office for Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe
A. SHEARLEY
Affiliation:
Formerly, National Manager, Expanded Programme on Immunization, Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Harare, Zimbabwe
W. J. BELLINI
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We conducted a survey to determine the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of measles in Zimbabwe. Between December 1996 and February 1997, we collected blood samples and clinical and demographic information from a sample of 105 children with a clinical diagnosis of measles. A clinical case of measles was defined as a person with a history of fever, rash for three or more days, and either cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis. A laboratory-confirmed case of measles or rubella had IgM antibodies against measles virus or rubella virus respectively. A total of 91% of children met the clinical case definition. Among those who met the clinical case definition for measles, 72% were IgM-positive for measles virus only, 23% were IgM-positive for rubella virus only, 3% were IgM-positive for both measles and rubella viruses, and 2% were IgM-negative for both viruses. This study demonstrates the importance of considering selective laboratory confirmation of measles in periods of high disease incidence when the effectiveness of the vaccine is questioned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press