Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:44:21.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple skin testing in leprosy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. C. Paul
Affiliation:
School of Pathology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, W1P 7LD
J. L. Stanford
Affiliation:
School of Pathology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, W1P 7LD
J. W. Carswell
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Mulago Hospital, P.O. Box 7051, Kampala
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Groups of patients with lepromatous and tuberculoid leprosy and hospital staff from six leprosaria in East Africa and ‘non-contact’ groups of villagers or staff from general hospitals have been skin tested with 10 reagents. These were prepared by ultrasonic disintegration from M. tuberculosis, M. duvalii, M. chelonei and 7 other species identified in the Ugandan environment. Comparisons were made of the percentages of positive reactors in each study group for each reagent. The ‘specific’ defect of lepromatous patients was found to apply to a variable extent to six of the species tested, but not to M. tuberculosis, M. avium or M. ‘A*’. The defect applied most noticeably to M. nonchromogenicum and M. vaccae, suggesting that they are more closely related to M. leprae than are the other species tested. The reagent Chelonin produced unexpected and anomalous results in the lepromatous group. It is suggested that this was due to an unusually slow clearing of Arthus' reaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Beiguelman, B. (1967). Leprosy & Genetics. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 37, 461–76.Google Scholar
Bönicke, R. & Juhasz, S. E. (1964). Beschreiburg der neuen Species Mycobacterium vaccae n. sp. Zentrablatt für Bakteriologie I. Abt. Orig. 192 133.Google Scholar
Bullock, W. E. (1968). Studies of immune mechanisms in leprosy. New England Journal of Medicine 278, 298304.Google Scholar
Godal, T., Myrvang, B., Stanford, J. L. & Samuel, D. R. (1974). Recent advances in the immunology of leprosy with special reference to new approaches in immunoprophylaxis. Bulletin de l'institut Pasteur 72, 273310.Google Scholar
Godal, T. & Negassi, K. (1973). Subclinical infection in leprosy. British Medical Journal iii, 557–9.Google Scholar
KinnearBrown, J. A. Brown, J. A. & Stone, M. M. (1966). B.C.G. vaccination of children against leprosy: First results of a trial in Uganda. British Medical Journal i, 713.Google Scholar
Korsak, T. & Boisvert, H. (1972). Mycobactéries à pigment rose. Annals de l'institut Pasteur 122, 3141.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, M. R. M., Arseculeratne, S. N. & Welianga, L. V. (1973). The differential tuberculin test in leprosy. Leprosy Review 44, 1321.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. G., Stanford, J. L. & Paul, R. C. (1974). A preliminary study of delayed hypersensitivity to Mycobacterium chelonei, M. fortuitum (ranae) and M. gordonae in cattle from two areas in Uganda. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 55, 374–83.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. L. & Paul, R. C. (1973). A preliminary report on some studies of environmental mycobacteria from Uganda. Annales de la Société beige de Médecine tropicale. 53, 389–93.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. L., Revill, W. D. L., Gunthorpe, W. J. & Grange, J. M. (1975). The production and preliminary investigation of Burulin, a new skin test reagent for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Journal of Hygiene 74, 716.Google Scholar
Tsukamura, M. (1965). A group of mycobacteria from soil sources resembling nonpholochromogens (group III). A description of Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum. Medicine & Biology (Tokyo) 71, 110–13.Google Scholar