Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:36:04.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mosquito-borne infections in Fiji: II. Arthropod-borne virus infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. Maguire ,
F. N. Macnamara ,
J. A. R. Miles ,
G. F. S. Spears  and
J. U. Mataika
T. Maguire
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
F. N. Macnamara
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. A. R. Miles
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
G. F. S. Spears
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. U. Mataika
Affiliation:
Wellcome Virus Laboratory, Colonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Surveys of arbovirus activity in Fiji were conducted over a 10-year period from December 1959 to December 1969. No arboviruses were isolated from over 200,000 mosquitoes, 9000 ticks, or 575 serum samples. Eight thousand human and 1117 bird, bat and animal sera were tested for haemagglutination-inhibiting arbovirus antibody using a variety of group A, group B and Bunyamwera group antigens. Only a small number of low-titre reactions were found among the non-human sera, but 14% of all human sera were found to contain Group B antibody. The antibody prevalence increased with increasing age, from less than 1 % for persons born since 1950, to 70% for persons born before 1900. The age differences in prevalence could be used to estimate the time and size of previous epidemics. Differences were found in antibody prevalence between the sexes, between ethnic groups and between persons from different regions. These differences could be explained in terms of climate, location and custom.

Historical and serological evidence both suggest that all the antibody detected was due to past exposure to dengue virus. The very high proportion of the population with no dengue antibody makes Fiji a high-risk area for a further dengue epidemic. Dengue virus is known to be active in the Pacific and South-East Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 287 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1958). Techniques for haemagglutination and haemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7, 561–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laigret, J., Rosen, L. & Scholammer, G. (1967). Sur une épidémie de dengue survenue à Tahiti en 1964. Relations avec les ‘fièvres hémorrhagiques’ du Sud-Est asiatique. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique 60, 339–53.Google Scholar
Maguire, T. & Macnamara, F. N.. (1966). The isolation of Coxsackie A viruses from human sera and mosquitoes in Fiji. Journal of Hygiene 64, 451–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Mataika, J. U., Dando, B. C., Spears, G. F. S. & Macnamara, F. N. (1971). Mosquito-borne infections in Fiji. I. Filariasis in northern Fiji: epidemiological evidence regarding factors influencing the prevalence of microfilaraemia of Wuchereria bancrofti infections. Journal of Hygiene 69, 273–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, J. A. R., Maguire, T., Austin, F. J., Ross, R. W. & Ordish, R. (1964). Evidence of arbovirus infections in Fiji. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 13, 327–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, J. A. R. & Stenhouse, A. C. (1969). Observations on Reovirus Type 3 in certain Culicine mosquitoes. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 18, 427–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwart, F. A. A. G. (1968). Report on the Census of the Population 1966. Government of Fiji, Council Paper no. 9 of 1968.Google Scholar