Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:42:25.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meningococcal ‘aseptic’ meningitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Constance A. C. Ross
Affiliation:
Regional Virus Laboratory and University Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow, N. W.
John Stevenson
Affiliation:
Regional Virus Laboratory and University Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow, N. W.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The usefulness of the meningococcal CF test was assessed by investigating sera from (a) patients with meningococcal meningitis from whom meningococci had been isolated, and (b) patients with aseptic meningitis in whom no virus aetiology had been demonstrated and from whose C.S.F. no bacteria had been isolated.

Meningococcal CF antibodies were relatively strain-specific; cross-reacting anti-bodies to heterologous strains were irregular both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Positive meningococcal CF tests were obtained in 8 cases of aseptic meningitis, 3 showing a predominance of lymphocytes and 5 a predominance of polymorpho-nuclears in C.S.F. As a result of these positive tests, the cases of lymphocytic aseptic meningitis were given energetic antibiotic therapy to avoid the possibility of more chronic infection.

We wish to thank many clinical and bacteriological colleagues for their co-operation, and Prof. S. Graham for details of one case. We are grateful to Dr Patricia Bradstreet, Standards Laboratory for Serological Reagents, London, N.W. 9, for meningococcal agglutination results, and to Miss C. Gourlay for valuable technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

Anderson, S. A., Donnelly, M., French, F. L., Kalra, S. L. & White, J. (1953). Influenza in Victoria, 1950 and 1951. Med. J. Aust. 2, 44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, A. S. G. (1920). Studies in the bacteriology, preventive control and specific treatment of cerebrospinal fever among the military forces, 1915–19. Med. Res. Counc. Spec. Rep., Lond., No. 50, 66.Google Scholar
Branham, S. E. (1953). Serological relationships among meningococci. Bact. Rev. 17, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combined Scottish Study (1961). Poliomyelitis-like disease in 1959. Brit. med. J. ii, 597.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, R. (1941). The complement fixation test in the diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis. J. Path. Bact. 52, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grist, N. R. (1957). The serological diagnosis of influenza in infancy. Scot. med. J. 2, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heycock, J. B. (1959). Partially treated meningitis in infants. Brit. med. J. i, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennette, E. H., Magoffin, R. L., Schmidt, N. J. & Hollister, A. C. (1959). Viral disease of the central nervous system. J. Amer. med Ass. 171, 1456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, H. M., Johnson, R. T., Crawford, I. P., Dascomb, H. E. & Rogers, N. G. (1960). Central nervous system syndromes of viral etiology. Amer. J. Med. 29, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, I. N. O. (1932). The gonococcal fixation test: further improvements in technique resulting in incroa sensitivity. J. Path. Bact. 35, 635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. A. C. (1961). Louping-ill in the west of Scotland. Lancet, ii, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar