Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:58:00.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanism of the Agglutination Reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Henry Priestley
Henry Priestley
Affiliation:
(From The Australian Institute of Tropical Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since Gruber and Nicolle expressed the opinion that the agglutination of bacteria by specific immune sera was due to the surfaces of the bacteria becoming viscous under the influence of the specific sera, many theories have been advanced aiming at a more complete explanation of the reaction. Bordet (1899) considered that the agglutinins by uniting with the agglutinable substances lead to changes in molecular attraction between the elements affected, either as among themselves, or between them and the surrounding fluid. He distinguished the two phases of the reaction, (1) the interaction between the agglutinin and the bacteria, and (2) the agglomeration of the bacteria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , February 1917 , pp. 485 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

References

REFERENCES

Arkwright, (1914). Jonrn. of Hygiene, XIV. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordet, (1899). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XIII. 225.Google Scholar
Chick, and Martin, (1910). Jonrn. of Physiol. XL. 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, and Martin, (1912). Jonrn. of Physiol. XLV. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. R. (1911). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. V. 62.Google Scholar
Dean, H. R. (1912). Proc. Roy. Soc. B. LXXXIV. 416.Google Scholar
Dreyer, (1904). Brit. Med. Journ. Sept. 10th.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, (1906). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XLI, 96.Google Scholar
Franceschalli, (1909). Arch. f. Hygiene, LXIX, 207Google Scholar
Joos, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XXXIII, 762.Google Scholar
Kraus, (1897). Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 431.Google Scholar
Löwit, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XXXIV. 156–251.Google Scholar
Moreschi, (1908). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XLVI, 456.Google Scholar
Neisser, and Friedemann, (1904). München. med. Wochenschr. No. 19.Google Scholar
Nicolle, (1898). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XII, 161.Google Scholar
Paltauf, (1897). Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 537.Google Scholar
Porges, (1906). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XL, 133.Google Scholar
Scheller, (1910). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Abt. I. Orig. LIV, 150.Google Scholar
Tullock, (1914). Biochem. Journ. VIII, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, and Chapman, (1906). Proc. Roy. Soc. B. LXVIII, 297.Google Scholar
Welsh, and Chapman, (1909). Journ. of Path. and Bacteriol, XIII, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar