Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:29:01.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The measurement of bacterial respiration on pig skin with micro-respirometers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. C. S. Woodroffe
R. C. S. Woodroffe
Affiliation:
Unilever Research Laboratory, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The respiration of bacteria normally present in thin slices of skin taken from pig's trotters has been measured in Cruickshank micro-respirometers.

2. These respirometers were originally designed to measure skin respiration in a medium including antibiotic to inhibit bacterial activity. The skin and medium was contained in a glass well. Using pig skin in a similar system without antibiotic, bacteria left the skin to grow independently in the medium. To overcome this difficulty polythene cups were made with an inner compartment for the tissue without medium and an outer compartment for water which provided a humid atmosphere.

3. Using polythene cups without medium the skin respiration was neglible, bacterial respiration was measured in situ and correlation between oxygen uptake and bacterial counts was obtained. This correlation was valid within experiments only.

4. Respiration of skin samples taken from adjacent areas of pig's trotter was similar, but there was large variation between samples from different trotters.

5. Respiration due to bacteria increased rapidly for 6–9 hr., followed by a slower increase. This may be due to a limited food supply or to a state of equilibrium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , September 1963 , pp. 273 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Baird-Parker, A. C. (1962). The occurrence and enumeration, according to a new classffication, of micrococci and staphylococci in bacon and on human and pig skin. J. appl. Bact. 25, 352.Google Scholar
Blank, I. H. & Dawes, R. K. (1958). The water content of the stratum corneum. IV. The importance of water in promoting bacterial multiplication on cornified epithelium. J. invest. Derm. 31, 141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, C. N. D. (1954). Continuous observation of the respiration of skin in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 7, 374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, C. N. D., Trotter, M. D. & Cooper, J. R. (1957). Studies on the carbohydrate metabolism of skin. Biochem. J. 66, 285.Google Scholar
Hurst, A., Stuttard, L. W. & Woodroffe, R. C. S. (1960). Disinfectants for use in bar-soaps. J. Hyg., Camb., 58, 159.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. C. & Ricketts, C. R. (1957). The metabolic uptake of sulphate ions by skin. Exp. Cell Res. 12, 633.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. C. (1959 a). Some effects of staphylococcal and streptococcal toxins upon mammalian skin in tissue culture. Brit. J. exp. Path. 40, 8.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. C. (1959 b). The comparative toxicity of antibiotics to skin. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 14, 168.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, P. B. (1938). The bacteriology of normal skin; a new quantitative test applied to the study of the bacterial flora and the disinfectant action of mechanical cleansing. J. infect. Dis. 63, 301.Google Scholar