Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:35:42.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mathematical analysis of concurrent epidemics of yaws and chickenpox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

John J. Gart  and
J. L. De Vries
John J. Gart
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20014, U.S.A.
J. L. De Vries
Affiliation:
Yaws Control Section, Department of Health, Government of Netherlands New Guinea
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between chickenpox and yaws epidemics occurring among children in a village in Netherlands New Guinea is analysed using the mathematical model for a simple deterministic epidemic. It is shown that the yaws epidemic accelerated significantly in the month following the chickenpox epidemic, but that it reverted to its previous rate in the succeeding months. The number of yaws cases attributable to the influence of the chickenpox is estimated from the projected course of the yaws epidemic. It is statistically verified that those children contracting chickenpox were more likely to become yaws cases in the subsequent month.

These results point to the danger of yaws's spread being much more rapid among a population which has recently been subject to an epidemic of chickenpox.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 431 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Abbey, H., (1952). An examination of the Reed–Frost theory of epidemics. Hum. Biol. 24, 201–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Bailey, N. T. J., (1957). The Mathematical Theory of Epidemics, pp. 20–2. London: Charles Griffin and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R., (1953). Some simple approximate tests for Poisson variates. Biometrika 40, 354–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, C. J., (1960). Some epidemiological aspects of yaws eradication. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 23, 739–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Hackett, C. J., (1963). On the origin of the human treponematoses. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 29, 7–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Hackett, C. J., & Guthe, T., (1956). Some important aspects of yaws eradication. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 15, 869–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Kranendonk, O. V., (1958). Serological and epidemiological aspects in yaws control. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Report (1960). Fifth report of the expert committee on venereal infections and treponematoses. Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 190, p. 36.Google Scholar
Soetopo, M., & Wasito, R., (1953). Experience with yaws control in Indonesia. In First International Symposium on Yaws Control. Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 15, p. 283.Google Scholar
Turner, T. B., & Hollander, D. H., (1957). Biology of the treponematoses. Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 35.Google ScholarPubMed