Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:01:24.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

M genotyping and DNA fingerprinting of Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from an area of central Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1998

M. MENCARELLI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
R. CORBISIERO
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
B. MARZOCCHI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
A. GISTRI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
R. SIGNORI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
A. ROSSOLINI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
C. CELLESI
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Infectious Disease, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

M protein gene typing was used to analyse Streptococcus pyogenes clinical isolates collected between 1983 and 1995 in an area of central Italy from patients presenting different types of infections; the same isolates were also characterized by means of DNA fingerprinting.

M type 1 was the most common (50% of study strains), followed by M types 4, 12 and 6. The proportion of M type 12 decreased with time, whereas M type 1 increased, in agreement with data obtained in many different areas. Most invasive strains belonged to types M1 (30%) and M12 (30%); on the other hand, the M1 type did frequently occur also among non-invasive isolates. DNA fingerprinting showed a correlation between M types and DNA patterns. This report provides epidemiological information from a geographic area not sampled recently, and further shows the usefulness of the M genotyping technique, which offers potential advantages over conventional serological typing methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press