Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:44:39.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory trials of three anticoagulant rodenticides for use against the Indian field mouse, Mus booduga Gray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

M. Balasubramanyam ,
M. J. Christopher  and
K. R. Purushotham
M. Balasubramanyam
Affiliation:
Pesticide and Industrial Toxicology Centre, Department of Zoology, S.V. University, Tirupati-517502, India
M. J. Christopher
Affiliation:
Pesticide and Industrial Toxicology Centre, Department of Zoology, S.V. University, Tirupati-517502, India
K. R. Purushotham
Affiliation:
Pesticide and Industrial Toxicology Centre, Department of Zoology, S.V. University, Tirupati-517502, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The efficacy of three anticoagulant rodenticides for use against the Indian field mouse, Mus booduga, was evaluated in the laboratory. The poisons, namely warfarin, bromadiolone and brodifacoum, were all found to be toxic enough at the concentrations normally used against other commensal and field rodents. With brodifacoum (0·00125%), bromadiolone (0·005%) and warfarin (0·025%), 83% of the animals died respectively after 1, 1 and 6 days' feeding. It is suggested that brodifacoum and bromadiolone might be more economical than warfarin for use in practical rodent control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 575 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

Chandrahas, R. K. (1974). Ecology of the Brown spiny mouse, Mus p. platythrix (Bennett), and the Indian field mouse, Mus b. booduga (Gray). Indian Journal of Medical Research 62, 264–280.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, G. C., Madsen, C. R. & Thakore, K. M. (1975). Studies on efficacy of different anticoagulant rodenticides on Rattus rattus (House rat). Proceedings – All India Rodent Seminar, Ahmedabad, pp. 139–141.Google Scholar
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (1975). Guide-lines for the development and biological evaluation of rodenticides. EPPO Bulletin 5, 1–49.Google Scholar
Gill, J. E. & Redfern, R. (1980). Laboratory trials of seven rodenticides for use against the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). Journal of Hygiene 85, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, R. P. & Prakash, I. (1980). Laboratory evaluation of anticoagulant-treated baits for the control of northern palm squirrel, Funambulus pennanti Wroughton. Journal of Hygiene 85, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohana Rao, A. M. K. (1977). Studies on some ecological aspects of the Indian field mouse, Mus boodug Gray. Ph.D. Dissertation, S.V. University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
Prakash, I. (1976). Rodent pest management: principles and practices. Monograph, no. 4, CAZRI, Jodhpur.Google Scholar
Purushotham, K. R. & Mohana Rao, A. M. K. (1979). The distribution of field rodents around Tirupati with a note on their burrowing habits. Andhra Agriculture Journal 26, 85–87.Google Scholar
Renapurkar, D. M. & Kamatii, V. R. (1982). Laboratory evaluation of brodifacoum, a new anticoagulant rodenticide. Bulletin of Haffkine Institute 10, 17–20.Google Scholar
Soni, B. K. & Prakash, I. (1982). Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 (Brodifacoum) against Gerbillus gleadowi Murray. Peslology 5, 23–24.Google Scholar