Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:32:40.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of responses and protective levels of antibody against attenuated influenza A viruses using single radial haemolysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. Al-Khayatt ,
R. Jennings  and
C. W. Potter
R. Al-Khayatt
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX
R. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX
C. W. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Antibody determinations against H3N2 and H1N1 type A influenza viruses were carried out on paired sera obtained from volunteers taking part in influenza virus vaccine studies, using both the haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH) test. Good correlation between the HI and SRH test was found for both H3N2 and H1N1 antibody and the zone area increases corresponding to significant SRH antibody rises determined for both virus strains. In both H3N2 and H1N1 vaccine studies, intranasal infection of the volunteers with live attenuated viruses was involved and by the measurement of HI and SRH antibodies prior to and following infection, levels of antibody equating with protection against the infecting viruses could be estimated. For the HI test the antibody titres associated with 50% protection were 42 for H1N1, and 44 for H3N2 viruses; for the SRH test, 50% protection was associated with zone areas of 20·0–25·0 mm2 for both H1N1 and H3N2 viruses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 301 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

Chakraverty, P. (1980). Comparison of haemagglutination-inhibition and single radial haemolysis techniques for detection of antibodies to influenza B virus. Archives of Virology 63, 285–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A., Potter, C. W., Jennings, R., Nicholl, J. P., Langrick, A. F., Schild, G. C., Wood, J. M. & Tyrrell, D. A. J. (1983 a). A comparison of live and inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccines. 1. Short-term immunity. Journal of Hygiene 90, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A., Potter, C. W., Jennings, R., Nicholl, J. P., Langrick, A. F., Schild, G. C., Wood, J. M. & Tyrrell, D. A. J. (1983 b). A comparison of live and inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccines. 2. Long-term immunity. Journal of Hygiene 90, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cretescu, L., Zilisteanu, E., Nigulescu, L. T., & Crainig, R. (1979). Detection and antibody responses to natural influenza infection and vaccination by the single radial haemolysis test. Archives Roumaines de Pathologie Experimenlale et de Microbiologie 38, 77–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Delem, A. & Jovanovic, D. (1978). Correlation between rate of infection and pre-existing titre of serum antibody as determined by single radial haemolysis during an epidemic of influenza A/Victoria/3/75. Journal of Infectious Diseases 137, 194–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowdle, R. W., Mostow, S. R., Coleman, M. T., Kaye, H. S., & Schoembaem, S. C. (1973). Inactivated influenza vaccines. 2. Laboratory indices of protection. Postgraduate Medical Journal 49, 150–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Farnik, J. & Bruj, J. (1966). An outbreak of influenza A2 in a population of known antibody profile. Journal of Infectious Diseases 116, 425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrohi, K., Farrohi, F. K., Noble, G. R., Kaye, H. S. & Kendal, A. P. (1977). Evaluation of the single radial haemolysis test for measuring haemagglutinat ion and neurminidase-specific antibodies to H3N2 influenza strains and antibodies to influenza B. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 5, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodeve, A. C., Jennings, R. & Potter, C. W. (1983). The use of the single radial haemolysis test for assessing antibody response and protective antibody levels in an influenza B vaccine study. Journal of Biology Standardisation 11, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grilli, E. A. & Davies, J. R. (1981). Influenza B at Christ's Hospital: natural antibody to influenza B estimated by radial haemolysis. Journal of Hygiene 87. 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, D., Curry, R. L. & Beare, A. S. (1973). Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titres as a measure of protection against influenza in man. International Symposium on Influenza Vaccines for Men and Horses. London, 1972. Symposium Series Immunological Standardisation 20, 164–168.Google Scholar
Hobson, D., Curry, R. L., Beare, A. S. & Ward-Gardner, A. (1972). The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibition antibody in protection against challenge infection with A2 and B viruses. Journal of Hygiene 70, 767–777.Google ScholarPubMed
Jennings, R.Denton, M. D. & Potter, C. W. (1976). The hamster as an experimental animal for the study of influenza. 1. The role of antibody in protection. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 162, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, R., Potter, C. W., Massey, P. M. O., Duerden, B. I., Martin, J. & Bevan, A. M. (1981). Reactions and serological responses of volunteers to one and two doses of inactivated influenza virus vaccines. Journal of Hygiene 86. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, R. T., Smith, T., Spencer, R. C., Mellersh, A. M., Edey, D., Fenton, P. & Potter, C. W. (1984). Inactivated influenza virus vaccines in man: a comparative study of subunit and split vaccines using two methods for assessment of antibody responses. Vaccine 2, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, J. P., Mortimer, P. P., Morgan-Capner, P., Shafi, M. S. & White, G. B. B. (1980). Rubella antibody measured by radial haemolysis. Characteristics and performance of a simple screening method for use in diagnostic laboratories. Journal of Hygiene 84, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Montagne, J. R. (1980). Summary of a workshop on influenza B viruses and Rey's syndrome. Journal of Infectious Diseases 142, 452–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, G., Donatelli, I., Arangio-Ruiz, G., Rozera, C. & Macchia, T. (1983). Comparison of haemagglutination-inhibition and single radial haemolysis techniques for detecting antibodies to influenza A and B viruses. Journal of Hygiene 91, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meiklejohn, G., Kempe, C. H., Thalman, W. G., & Lennette, E. H. (1952). Evaluation of monovalent influenza vaccines. II. Observations during an A-prime epidemic. American Journal of Hygiene 55, 12–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Oxford, J. S., Yetts, R. & Schild, G. C. (1982). Quantitation and analysis of the specificity of post-immunization antibodies to influenza B vinises using single radial haemolysis. Journal of Hygiene 88, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, C. W., Jennings, R., Nicholson, K., Tyrrell, D. A. J. & Dickinson, K. G. (1977). Immunity to attenuated influenza virus WRL 105 infection induced by heterologous, inactivated influenza A virus vaccines. Journal of Hygiene 79, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, C. W. & Oxford, J. S. (1979). Determinants of immunity to influenza infection in man. British Medical Bulletin 35, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyhäla, R. & Aho, K. (1975). Serum HI antibody protection against influenza: a follow-up survey at community level of three epidemics caused by different H3N2-variants. International Journal of Epidemiology 4, 127–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, S. M., McCahon, D., & Beare, A. S. (1975). A single radial haemolysis technique for the measurement of influenza antibody. Journal of General Virology 27, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schild, G. C., Pereira, M. S. & Chakraverty, P. (1975). Single radial haemolysis: a new method for the assay of antibody influenza haemagglutinin. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 52, 43–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1981). The epidemiology and prevention of influenza. American Scientist 69, 166–172.Google ScholarPubMed
Stuart-Harris, C. H. & Schild, G. C. (1976). Influenza: the Viruses and the Disease, chapter 3, pp. 185–195. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vaananen, R., Hovi, T., Helle, E. P. & Penttinen, K. (1976). Determination of mumps and influenza antibodies by haemolysis-in-gel. Archives of Virology 52, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation Expert Committee on Influenza (1953). First Report. World Health Organisation Technical Report Series, no. 64.Google Scholar
Wright, P. F., Bryant, J. D. & Karzona, D. T. (1980). Comparison of influenza B/Hong Kong virus infection among infants, children and young adults. Journal of Infectious Diseases 141, 430–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamagishi, H., Nagamine, T., Shimoda, K., Ide, S., Igarishi, Y., Yoshioka, I. & Matumoto, M. (1982). Comparative measurement of equine influenza virus antibodies in horse sera by single radial haemolysis, neutralisation and haemagglutination-inhibition tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 15, 660–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar