Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:29:20.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of porcine mycoplasmas with fresh animal serum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. H. Roberts
D. H. Roberts
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When fresh animal serum was dropped onto seeded mycoplasma agar plates, inhibition of growth frequently occurred. This effect was dependent on the mycoplasma serotype and on the animal species from which the fresh serum came. This activity of fresh animal serum was heat-labile and would not diffuse through the agar medium. Growth of all the porcine mycoplasma serotypes was inhibited by fresh sheep serum. M. hyorhinis, M. hyopneumoniae, B 3 and the P 45 strains were insensitive to fresh horse serum. The addition of fresh horse serum to specific M. hyorhinis rabbit antiserum-impregnated disks appeared to have a synergistic effect and the combination of M. hyorhinis antiserum-impregnated disk and fresh horse serum always inhibited the growth of M. hyorhinis strains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1971 , pp. 361 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Barker, L. F. & Patt, J. K. (1967). Role of complement in immune inactivation of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Journal of Bacteriology 94, 403.Google Scholar
Brown, T. M., Swift, H. F. & Watson, R. F. (1940). Pseudocolonies simulating those of pleuropneumonia-like micro-organisms. Journal of Bacteriology 40, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyde, W. A. (1964). Mycoplasma species identification based upon growth inhibition by specific antisera. Journal of Immunology 92, 958.Google Scholar
Dinter, Z., Danielsson, D. & Bakos, K. (1965). Differentiation of porcine mycoplasma strains. Journal of General Microbiology 41, 77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinter, Z. & Taylor-Robinson, D. (1969). Susceptibility and resistance of various strains of Mycoplasma hyorhinis to antisera, polymyxins and low pH values. Journal of General Microbiology 57, 263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, M. D., Farnham, A. E., Levinthal, J. D. & Scala, A. R. (1962). Cytopathic effect of the atypical pneumonia organism in cultures of human tissue. Journal of Bacteriology 84, 1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friis, N. F. (1970). A new porcine mycoplasma species: Mycoplasma suidaniae. Acta veterinaria scandinavica 11, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gois, M., Cerny, M. & Veznikova, D. (1970). Relationship between metabolism-inhibiting antibodies and colonial growth of Mycoplasma hyorhinis and other porcine mycoplasma in the presence of rabbit and pig sera. Research in Veterinary Science 11, 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, R. F. W. & Whittlestone, P. (1966). Enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Growth and behaviour of the causal mycoplasma in liquid media. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 47, 518.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1967). Characterization of Mycoplasma suipneumoniae: a mycoplasma causing enzootic pneumonia of pigs. Journal of Hygiene 65, 85.Google Scholar
Hayflick, L. (1965). Tissue cultures and mycoplasma. Texas Reports on Biology and Medicine 23, 285.Google Scholar
Hayflick, L. & Stanbridge, E. (1967). Isolation and identification of mycoplasma from human clinical materials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 143, 608.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K., Nordin, A. A. & Henry, C.. (1963). In Cell-bound Antibodies, p. 109. Ed. Amos, H. and Koprowski, H.. Philadelphia, U.S.A.: Wistar Institute Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. H. & Kelsey, J. C. (1960). A standard culture medium for general bacteriology. Journal of Hygiene 58, 367.Google ScholarPubMed
Priestley, F. W. (1952). Observations on immunity to contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, with special reference to the bactericidal action of blood. British Veterinary Journal 108, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. H. (1968). Immunological response in cows to Mycoplasma bovigenitalium, strain 1836. Journal of Hygiene 66, 585.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D. H. & McDaniel, J. W. (1967). Mechanism of egg transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Journal of Comparative Medicine 77, 439.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. H. & Little, T. W. A. (1970). Serologioal studies in pigs with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Journal of Comparative Medicine 80, 211.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D. H. & Gois, M.. (1970). A previously unreported serotype of porcine mycoplasma. Veterinary Record 87, 214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, R. F. & Karmon, J. A. (1970). Heterogeneity among strains of Mycoplasma granularum and identification of Mycoplasma hyosynoviae, sp.n. Journal of Bacteriology 103, 707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Switzer, W. P. (1964). In Diseases of Swine, p. 498. Ed. Dunn, H. W.. Iowa State University Press, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, D. (1968). The biology of mycoplasma. Journal of Clinical Pathology 21 (suppl. no. 2), 38.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, D. & Dinter, Z.. (1968). Unexpected serotypes of mycoplasma isolated from pigs. Journal of General Microbiology 53, 221.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, D., Purcell, R. H., Wong, D. C. & Chanock, R. M. (1966). A colour test for the measurement of antibody to certain mycoplasma species based upon the inhibition of acid production. Journal of Hygiene 64, 91.Google Scholar