Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:39:13.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innate resistance to myxomatosis in wild rabbits in England*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Ross
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Field Research Station, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey GU3 3LQ
M. F. Sanders
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Field Research Station, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey GU3 3LQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from one study area in England have been used over a period of 11 years to investigate the possible appearance of innate resistance to myxomatosis. Rabbits of 4–6 weeks old were captured alive, retained in the laboratory until at least 4 months old, and then infected with a type of myxoma virus which kills 90–95% of laboratory rabbits. Observations were made of symptoms, mortality rate and survival times.

In the first 4 years of the study (1966–9), mortality rates were not significantly different from those of laboratory rabbits, although survival times of wild rabbits were appreciably longer. In 1970, the mortality rate amongst wild rabbits was 59%, in 1974 it was 17%, and in 1976 it was 20%, thus showing that a considerable degree of inherited resistance to myxomatosis has developed.

The types of myxoma virus most commonly isolated from wild rabbits in Great Britain in recent years have been those which cause 70–95% mortality in laboratory rabbits. Therefore, if the degree of innate resistance demonstrated is widespread in Great Britain, there are serious implications regarding the size of the rabbit population, because myxomatosis has been an important factor in holding rabbit numbers at a relatively low level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Chapple, P. J. & Bowen, E. T. W. (1963). A note on two attentuated strains of myxoma virus isolated in Great Britain. Journal of Hygiene 61, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, G. W. & Tighe, F. G. (1965). Observations on the innate resistance of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), in Victoria, Australia, to selected strains of myxomatosis. Quoted in Fenner, F. & Ratcliffe, F. N. (1965). Myxomatosis, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fenner, F. & Chapple, P. J. (1965). Evolutionary changes in myxoma virus in Britain. An examination of 222 naturally occurring strains obtained from 80 counties during the period October–November 1962. Journal of Hygiene 63, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F., Day, F. F. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1956). Epidemiological consequences of the mechanical transmission of myxomatosis by mosquitoes. Journal of Hygiene 54, 284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. & Marshall, I. D. (1957). A comparison of the virulence for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of strains of myoxma virus recovered in the field in Australia, Europe and America. Journal of Hygience 55, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, I. D. & Douglas, G. W. (1961). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VIII. Further observations on changes in the innate resistance of Australian wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. Journal of Hygiene 59, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, I. D. & Fenner, F. (1958). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. V. Changes in the innate resistance of Australian wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. Journal of Hygiene 56, 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, I. D. & Fenner, F. (1960). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VII. The virulence of strains of myxoma virus recovered from Australian wild rabbits between 1951 and 1959. Journal of Hygiene 58, 485.Google ScholarPubMed
Mead-Briggs, A. R. & Vaughan, J. A. (1975). The differential transmissibility of myxoma virus strains of differing virulence grades by the rabbit flea Spilopsyllus cuniculi (Dale). Journal of Hygiene 75, 237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampford, M. R. (1954). The estimation of response-time distribution. III. Truncation and survival. Biometrics 10, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobey, W. R. (1969). Selection for resistance to myxomatosis in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Hygiene 67, 743.Google ScholarPubMed
Sobey, W. R., Conolly, D. & Adams, K. M. (1970). Myxomatosis: measuring antibodies to soluble antigens collected on filter paper strips. Australian Journal of Science 32, 331.Google Scholar
Vaughan, H. E. N. & Vaughan, J. A. (1968). Some aspects of the epizootiology of myxomatosis. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 24, 289.Google Scholar