Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:35:03.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibition of colonization of the chicken caecum with Salmonella typhimurium by pre-treatment with strains of Escherichia coli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

P. A. Barrow  and
J. F. Tucker
P. A. Barrow
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs. PE17 2DA
J. F. Tucker
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs. PE17 2DA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Simultaneous oral administration of broth cultures of three strains of Escherichia coli isolated from sewage and an abattoir strongly inhibited the colonization of a subsequently administered strain of Salmonella typhimurium. The three strains were protective against the S. typhimurium strain under a variety of conditions: in different breeds and in chickens fed different diets. The strains were not equally effective against other salmonella strains. Oral administration of the strains produced a statistically significant reduction in the excretion of the S. typhimurium strain over a period of 7 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 96 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 161 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, E. M., Impey, C. S. & Cooper, D. M. (1980). Manipulation of the crop and intestinal flora of the newly hatched chick. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 2426–2433.Google Scholar
Coloe, P. J., Bagust, T. J. & Ireland, L. (1984). Development of the normal gastrointestinal microflora of specific pathogen-free chickens. Journal of Hygiene 92, 79–87.Google Scholar
Dorn, P. & Krasbisch, P. (1981). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Salmonella-Bekampfung beim Mastkuken durch Substitution der Darmflora. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 88, 54–59.Google Scholar
Idziack, E. S. & Caldwell, M. (1977). The influence of normal intestinal flora of chickens in S. infantis and S. typhimurium. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Salmonella and Prospects for Control (ed. Barnum, D. A.), pp. 267–268. Guelph, Ontario: University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Impey, C. S., Mead, G. C. & George, S. M. (1982). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the chick caecum using a defined mixture of bacterial isolates from the caecal microflora of the adult bird. Journal of Hygiene 89, 479–490.Google Scholar
Konowalchuk, J., Spiers, J. I. & Stavric, S. (1977). Vero responses to a cytotoxin of Escherichia coli. Infection and Immunity 18, 775–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, A. B., Cumming, R. B. & Kent, R. D. (1977). Prevention of Salmonella typhimurium infection in poultry by pre-treatment of chickens and poults with intestinal extracts. Australian Veterinary Journal 53, 82–87.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732–749.Google Scholar
Milner, K. C. & Shaffer, M. E. (1952). Bacteriologic studies of experimental salmonella infections in chicks. Journal of Infectious Diseases 90, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurmi, E. & Rantala, M. (1973). New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature, London 241, 210–211.Google Scholar
Rantala, M. (1974). Cultivation of a bacterial flora able to prevent the colonization of Salmonella infantis in the intestines of broiler chickens, and its use. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica, Section B 82, 75–80.Google Scholar
Rantala, M. & Nurmi, E. (1973). Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. British Poultry Science 14, 627–630.Google Scholar
Rigby, C., Pettit, J. & Robertson, A. (1977). The effect of normal intestinal flora on the salmonella carrier state in poultry with species reference to S. thompson and S. typhimurium. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Salmonella and Prospects for Control (ed. Barnum, D. A.), p. 263. Guelph, Ontario: University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1965). The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 90, 495–513.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. & Gyles, C. L. (1970). The effect of cell-free fluids prepared from cultures of human and animal enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli on ligated intestinal segments of rabbits and pigs. Journal of Medical Microbiology 3, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. Williams & Huggins, M. B. (1976). Further observations on the association of the Colicin V plasmid of Escherichia coli with pathogenicity and survival in the alimentary tract. Journal of General Microbiology 92, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. Williams & Linggood, M. A. (1971). The transmissible nature of enterotoxin production in a human enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Journal of Medical Microbiology 4, 301–305.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1975). The effect of antibiotic therapy on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium by experimentally infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 75, 275–292.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1980). The virulence of salmonella strains for chickens: their excretion by infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 84, 479–488.Google Scholar
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. & Smyser, C. F. (1978). Protecting chicks and poults from salmonellae by oral administration of ‘normal’ gut microflora. Avian Diseases 22, 173–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. & Smyser, C. F. (1979). Further studies on competitive exclusion for controlling salmonellosis in chickens. Avian Diseases 24, 904–914.Google Scholar
Soerjadi, A. S., Lloyd, A. B. & Cumming, R. B. (1978). Streptococcus faecalis, a bacterial isolate which protects young chickens from enteric invasion by salmonellae. Axistralian Veterinary Journal 54, 549–550.Google Scholar