Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:50:01.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The incidence of natural diphtheria antitoxin in horses: its influence on the results of antigenic stimulus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. N. Basu  and
R. N. Roy
P. N. Basu
Affiliation:
Serum Department, Bengal Immunity Laboratory, Calcutta
R. N. Roy
Affiliation:
Serum Department, Bengal Immunity Laboratory, Calcutta
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Out of 221 horses tested 34·8 % showed natural diphtheria antitoxin to the extent of 0·02 unit or more per c.c. of serum.

2. Amongst the horses in which no natural circulating antitoxin was detected, a much larger number failed to respond to stimulus than amongst those having circulating antitoxin. But, amongst the animals that did show appreciable response to primary stimulus, there was not much difference in degree of response between the horses with and those without natural circulating antitoxin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , May 1946 , pp. 348 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

References

REFERENCES

Barr, M. & Glenny, A. T. (1945). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, B. M. (1896). J. Exp. Med. 1, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenny, A. T. (1925 a). J. Path. Bact. 28, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenny, A. T. (1925 b). J. Hyg., Camb., 24, 301.Google Scholar