Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:05:14.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The incidence of Brucella infections in producer-retailer herds in North Lancashire from 1965 to 1972

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. Robertson ,
I. D. Farrell  and
P. M. Hinchliffe
L. Robertson
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Infirmary, Meadow Street, Preston PR 1 6 PS
I. D. Farrell
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Infirmary, Meadow Street, Preston PR 1 6 PS
P. M. Hinchliffe
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Infirmary, Meadow Street, Preston PR 1 6 PS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The results are presented of testing untreated producer–retailer herd milk samples for the presence of Brucella abortus during the period 1965–1972 in the North Lancashire region.

There was a steady decline in the incidence of infected herds from 22 % in 1965 to 12% in 1971. A sharp fall to 5% in 1972 suggests that the introduction of the Brucellosis Incentives Scheme and the eradication programme has helped to reduce the practice of selling brucella-infected cattle in the open market which was prevalent in the period 1965 to 1970.

This practice of selling brucella-infected cattle may also be a prime factor in the changing pattern of distribution of the biotypes of B. abortus which was observed during the period 1965 to 1970.

A comparison of the two areas in the region show that the incidence of herd infection was always greater in the area containing flying herds than in the area in which self-contained herds predominated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 9 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Alton, G. G. & Jones, L. M. (1967). Laboratory techniques in Brucellosis. World Health Organization, Monograph Series, No. 55.Google ScholarPubMed
Farrell, I. D. (1974). The development of a new selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from contaminated sources. Research in Veterinary Science (in Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard, (1966). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons Official Report. 735, Column 96.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. J. (1969). Cause for concern. Dealing in Brucella-infected cattle. British Medical Journal iv, 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, F. B., Vessey, M. P., Macrae, W. D., Lawson, J. R., MacKinnon, D. J. & Morgan, W. J. B. (1964). Brucellosis in the British Dairy Herd. Animal Disease: Survey No. 4. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mair, N. S. (1955). A selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from herd samples of milk. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 14, 184.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health Circular 17/66, 24th October 1966.Google Scholar
Morris, E. J. (1956). A selective medium for Brucella spp. Journal of General Microbiology 15, 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Report, 1956. The value of the milk ring test (MRT) and related tests in the detection of brucella organisms in milk supplies. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 15, 85.Google Scholar
Robertson, L. (1961). Brucella organisms in milk. Royal Society of Health Journal 81, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, W. J. (1967). A selective medium for the isolation of Brucella abortus from milk. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 26, 33.Google ScholarPubMed