Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:28:04.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incidence and spread of Haemophilus influenzae on an Antarctic base determined using the polymerase chain reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. P. Hobson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
A. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
K. Rawal
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
T. H. Pennington
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
K. J. Forbes
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A PCR-based method of detecting Haemophilus influenzae in cultures inoculated from throat swabs was evaluated using samples from groups of laboratory staff and medical students and then applied to samples originating from the closed human community of an Antarctic research station. Suitable PCR primers to an H. influenzae gene (ompP2) were used to amplify the gene from DNA preparations made from mixed growth on chocolate agar with added vancomycin. PCR product was reamplified and subjected to restriction endonuclease digestion to allow temporal and spatial mapping of strains over an 8-month period. Eleven different strains of H. influenzae were detected. One particular strain was detected in a third of the base members.

Type
Special Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

1.Tzabar, Y, Pennington, TH. The population structure and transmission of Escherichia coli in an isolated human community; studies on an Antarctic base. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 107: 537–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Maggs, AF, Pennington, TH. Temporal study of staphylococcal species on the skin of human subjects in isolation and clonal analysis of Staphylococcus capitis by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 2627–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lacoux, PA, Jordens, JZ, Fenton, CM, Guiney, M, Pennington, TH. Characterization of enterococcal isolates by restriction enzyme analysis of genomic DNA. Epidemiol Infect 1992; 109: 6980.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Kerr, GRD, Forbes, KJ, Pennington, TH. An analysis of the diversity of Haemophilus parainfluenzae in the adult human respiratory tract by genomic DNA fingerprinting. Epidemiol Infect 1993; 111: 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Shapiro, E, Ward, JI. The epidemiology and prevention of disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Epidemiol Rev 1991; 13: 113–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Lester, A, Pedersen, PB. Serious systemic infection caused by non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzas biotype III in an adult. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 23: 111–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Forbes, KJ, Morgan, MG, Williams, A, Gould, IM. Molecular epidemiology of invasive Haemophilus influenzae in Scotland. Communicable Diseases and Environmental Health in Scotland Weekly Report 1994; 28 (19): 49.Google Scholar
8.Duim, B, Dankert, J, Jansen, H, van Alphen, L. Genetic analysis of the diversity in outer membrane protein P2 of non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. Microbial Pathogenesis 1993; 14: 451–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Forbes, KJ, Bruce, KD, Ball, A, Pennington, TH. Variation in length and sequence of porin (ompP2) alleles of non-capsulate Haemophilus influenzae. Mol Microbiol 1992; 6: 2107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hansen, EJ, Hasemann, C, Clausell, A et al. , Primary structure of the porin protein of Haemophilus influenzae type b determined by nucleotide sequence analysis. Infect Immun 1989; 57: 1100–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Munson, R, Tolan, RW. Molecular cloning, expression and primary sequence of outer membrane protein P2 of Haemophilus influenzae type b. Infect Immun 1989; 57: 8894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Kocagoz, T, Yilmaz, E, Ozkara, S et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples by polymerase chain reaction using a simplified procedure. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1435–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Folguiera, L, Delgado, R.Palenque, E, Noriega, A. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in clinical samples by using a simple lysis method and polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1019–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Roosendaal, R, Walboomers, JMM, Veltmann, OR et al. Comparison of different primer sets for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol 1993; 38: 426–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Tamburrini, E, Mencarini, P, De Luca, A et al. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: specificity and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction in comparison with immunofluorescence in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. J Med Microbiol 1993; 38: 449–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Luneberg, E, Jensen, JS, Frosch, M. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumonias by polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive hybridization in microtiter plates. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1088–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Nguyen, AH, Engstrand, L, Genta, RM, Graham, DY, El-Zaatari, FAK. Detection of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 783–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Song, J, Cho, H, Park, MY et al. Detection of Salmonella typhi in the blood of patients with typhoid fever by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1439–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Johnson, JD.Butcher, PD.Savva, D, Holliman, RE. Application of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. J Infect 1993; 26: 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Van Ketel, RJ, De Wever, B.Van Alphen, L. Detection of Haemophilus influenzae in cerebrospinal fluids by polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Med Microbiol 1990:33:271–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Forbes, KJ.Bruce, KD.Jordens, JZ, Ball, A, Pennington, TH. Rapid methods in bacterial DNA fingerprinting. J Gen Microbiol 1991; 137: 2051–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Edwards, U, Rogall, T.Blocker, H.Emde, M, Bottger, E. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterisation of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acid Res 1989; 17: 7843–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Sambrook, J.Fritsch, EF, Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning; a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Habor laboratory, 1989.Google Scholar
24.Bjourson, AJ, Cooper, JE. Band-stab PCR: a simple technique for the purification of individual PCR products. Nucleic Acid Res 1992; 20: 4675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Sikkema, DJ.Murphy, TF. Molecular analysis of the P2 porin protein of nontypable Haemophilus influenzae. Infect Immun 1992; 60: 5204–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Noble, WO, Somerville, DA. Major problems in dermatology. In: Microbiology of human skin, vol 2. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1974; 50–3.Google Scholar
27.Turk, DC, May, JR. Haemophilus influenzae. its clinical importance. 1st edn.English Universities Press Ltd, 1967: 18.Google Scholar
28.Takala, AK, Eskola, J, Leinonen, M et al. Reduction of oropharyngeal carriage of Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) in children immunized with an Hib conjugate vaccine. J Infect Dis 1991; 164: 982–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Masters, PL, Brumfitt, W, Mendez, RL. Bacterial flora of the upper respiratory tract in Paddington families, 1952–4. B M J 1958; 1200–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Kuklinska, D, Kilian, M. Relative proportions of Haemophilus species in the throat of healthy children and adults. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1984; 3: 249–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Turk, DC, May, JR. Haemophilus influenzae, its clinical importance. 1st edn.English Universities Press, 1967: 41—2.Google Scholar