Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:59:21.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Importance of the carrier state as a source of Staphylococcus aureus in wound sepsis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Frank M. Calia
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Surgery, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.
Emanuel Wolinsky
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Surgery, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.
Edward A. Mortimer Jr
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Surgery, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.
Jerome S. Abrams
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Surgery, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.
Charles H. Rammelkamp Jr
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Surgery, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship of pre-operative nasal and skin carriage of Staphylococcus aureus to wound colonization and sepsis was studied in 269 patients. Thirty-seven per cent of 96 carriers developed wound colonization as compared to 16 % among non-carriers (a statistically significant difference). The wound sepsis rates were 17 % and 9 % respectively. The combination of nasal and skin carriage was an important factor, since the sepsis rate among skin carriers (most of whom were nasal carriers as well) was 22%. Among carriers, the homologous strain was recovered from the majority of wound colonizations and from all instances of wound sepsis. A carrier strain also was recovered from 52% of the wounds colonized and from 50% of septic wounds in the entire study group. Profuse nasal carriage resulted in a significantly greater number of septic wounds (31%) than sparse carriage (9%). Wound cultures before closure, and skin from the initial incision site only once yielded a patient's carrier strain or a strain of Staph. aureus that was later recovered from the wound. The results indicate that measures designed to control the carrier state or to isolate the wound from the external environment should reduce wound sepsis by approximately one half.

Excellent technical aid was furnished by Eleanor Ford, R. N., Edith E. Silverman, Adrienne Marus, M. S., and Patricia Welch.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

Altemeier, W. A., Hummel, R. P. & Hill, E. O. (1966). Prevention of infection in colon surgery. Archs Surg., Chicago 93, 226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, H. F. M., Ferguson, W. G., Huffman, E., Walter, M., Blowers, R. & Conn, C. A. (1963). Sources of staphylococcal infection in surgical wound sepsis. J. Hyg., Camb. 61, 83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, A. F., Ryan, E. A., Glassow, F. J., Martin, C. J. & Shouldice, E. E. (1959). Staphylococcic wound infections: study of wound infections in several thousand hernia cases. J. Am. med. Ass. 170, 1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, W. E., Hall, J. W., Spink, W. W., Damsky, L. J., Greene, V. W., Vesley, D. & Bauer, H. (1964). A staphylococcal isolation service: epidemiologic and clinical studies over one year. Ann. intern. Med. 60, 777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, J. F. (1963). Identification of the sources of staphylococci contaminating the surgical wound during operation. Ann. Surg. 158, 898.Google Scholar
Burke, J. F. & Corrigan, E. A (1961). Staphylococcal epidemiology on surgical ward: fluctuations in ward staphylococcal contents, its effect on hospitalized patients and the extent of endemic hospital strains. New Engl. J. Med. 264, 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L. S., Fekety, F. R. & Cluff, L. E (1964). Studies of the epidemiology of staphylococcal infection. VI. Infections in the surgical patient. Ann. Surg. 159, 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colbeck, J. C. (1960). Environmental aspects of staphylococcal infections acquired in hospitals. I. The hospital environment—its place in the hospital staphylococcus infections problems. Am. J. publ. Hlth 50, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, W. R. & Bernard, H. R. (1964). Relationship of skin carriage to post-operative staphylococcal wound infection. Surg. Forum. 15, 52.Google Scholar
Ehrenkranz, N. J. (1964). Person to person transmission of Staphylococcus aureus: quantitative characterization of nasal carriers spreading infection. New Engl. J. Med. 271, 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fekety, F. R. Jr,. (1964). The epidemiology and prevention of staphylococcal infection. Medicine, Baltimore 43, 593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, C. W. & Marston, A. T. (1962). A study on sources of post-operative staphylococcal infections. Surgery Gynec. Obstet. 115, 266.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, J. S. & Sklaroff, S. A. (1958). Incidence of wound infection. Lancet. i, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, A. S., Bloch, J. H., Crawford, D. I., Lieberman, J. E. & Smith, R. R. (1962). The role of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in control of staphylococcal infections following cancer surgery. Surgery Gynec. Obstet. 114, 345.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindbom, G. & Laurell, G. (1967 a). Studies on the epidemiology of staphylococcal infections. 4. Effect of nasal chemotherapy on carrier state in patients and on post-operative sepsis. Acta. path. microbiol. scand. 69, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbom, G. & Laurell, G. (1967 b). Studies on the epidemiology of staphylococcal infections. 5. Importance of environmental factors during the early post-operative phase. Acta. path. microbiol. scand. 69, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbom, G., Laurell, G. & Grenvik, A. (1967). Studies on the epidemiology of staphylococcal infections. 3. Influence of factors inherent in the patient and his operation. Acta. path. microbiol. scand. 69, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowden, T. G., Vaithilingham, P. S. & Milne, J. B. (1962). Post-operative infection in a casualty department. Lancet ii, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcneill, I. F., Porter, I. A. & Green, C. A. (1961). Staphylococcal infection in a surgical ward; a three month study. Br. med. J. ii, 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. & Gardner, A. M. N. (1963). A study of post-operative wound infection in a provincial general hospital. J. Hyg., Camb. 61, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. R. (1965). Significance of clean wound cultures. Am. Surg. 31, 153.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. S., Duffy, J. P. & Mou, T. W. (1965). Staphylococcal sepsis and patient's nasal-carrier state. Archs Surg., Chicago 90, 294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rountree, P. M., Harrington, M., Loewenthal, J. & Gye, R. (1960). Staphylococcal wound infection in a surgical unit. Lancet ii, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinefield, H. R., Ribble, J. C., Boris, M. & Eichenwald, H. F. (1963). Bacterial interference: its effect on nursery-acquired infection with Staphylococcus aureus. I. Preliminary observations on artificial colonization of newborns. Am. J. Dis. Child. 105, 646.Google Scholar
Walter, C. W. (1958). Environmental sepsis. Mod. Hosp. 91, 69.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, H. J. (1959). The relation between the nasal-staphylococcal-carrier state and the incidence of postoperative complications. New Engl. J. Med. 260, 1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, A. (1961). Relation between quantitative nasal cultures and dissemination of staphylococci. J. Lab. din. Med. 58, 273.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., Jevons, M. P., Shooter, R. A., Hunter, C. J. W., Girling, J. A., Griffiths, J. D. & Taylor, G. W. (1959). Nasal staphylococci and sepsis in hospital patients. Br. med. J. ii, 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., Noble, W. C., Jevons, M. P., Lidwell, O. M., Shooter, R. A., White, R. G., Thom, B. T. & Taylor, G. W. (1962). Isolation for the control of staphylococcal infection in surgical wards. Br. med. J. ii, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R. I., Sweeney, F. J. Jr, Haupt, G. J. & Waddell, M. A. (1959). The environmental distribution of Staphylococcus aureus in an operating suite. Ann. Surg. 149, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar