Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:36:38.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunity to influenza in ferrets

XI. Cross-immunity between A/Hong Kong/68 and A/England/72 viruses: serum antibodies produced by infection or immunization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. McLaren ,
C. W. Potter  and
R. Jennings
C. McLaren
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, England
C. W. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, England
R. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The degree of immunity due to cross-reactions between antibody to influenza virus A/Hong Kong/1/68 and A/England/42/72 was studied in ferrets. Ferrets were immunized with the viruses by either live infection or by inoculation with inactivated virus vaccines. The vaccines were given with Freund's incomplete adjuvant or were given to ferrets previously infected with influenza virus A/PR/8/34. As a result of these immunizations the animals all produced similar titres of serum HI antibody to the immunizing virus, although the degree of crossreaction with the other virus strain was variable. After immunization the animals were challenged by infection with an A/Eng/42/72-like virus and their degree of immunity was measured. It was found that the greatest immunity was in ferrets previously infected with the homologous A/Eng/42/72 virus. Animals previously infected with A/HK/68 virus also showed a measurable degree of immunity to A/Eng/42/72 infection, and this was greater than that found in animals given inactivated virus vaccines. The immunity produced by the vaccines was approximately equal, regardless of which vaccine or method of immunization was used. Thus, live infection produced a more effective, broader immunity than did the use of inactivated virus vaccines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 389 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Francis, T. & Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1938). Studies on the nasal histology of epidemic influenza virus infection in the ferret. III. Histological and serological observations on ferrets receiving repeated inoculations of epidemic influenza virus. Journal of Experimental Medicine 68, 813–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haff, R. F. & Pinto, C. A. (1973). Comparison of neutralizing activity in nasal secretion and serum of ferrets in response to infection with influenza A viruses. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 40, 168–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haff, R. F., Schriver, P. W., Engle, C. G. & Stewart, R. C. (1966). Pathogenesis of influenza in ferrets. 1. Tissue and blood manifestations of disease. Journal of Immunology 96, 659–67.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, C. & Potter, C. W. (1974). Immunity to influenza in ferrets VII. Effect of previous infection with heterotypic and heterologous influenza viruses on the response of ferrets to inactivated influenza virus vaccines. Journal of Hygiene 72, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakley, C. L. & Warrack, G. H. (1940). Immunity and antibody to influenza in mice. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 50, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, M. S., Chakraverty, P., Schild, G. C., Coleman, M. T. & Dowdle, W. R. (1972). Prevalence of antibody to current influenza viruses and effect of vaccination on antibody response. British Medical Journal iv, 701–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. W., McLaren, C. & Shore, S. L. (1973). Immunity to influenza in ferrets. V. Immunization with inactivated virus in adjuvant 65. Journal of Hygiene 71, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, C. W., Oxford, J. S., Shore, S. L., McLaren, C. & Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1972a). Immunity to influenza in ferrets. I. Response to live and killed virus. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 53, 153–67.Google Scholar
Potter, C. W., Shore, S. L., McLaren, C. & Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1972b). Immunity to influenza in ferrets. II. Influence of adjuvants on immunization. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 53, 168–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Schild, G. C., Henry-Aymard, M., Pereira, M. S., Chakraverty, P., Dowdle, W., Coleman, M. & Chang, W. K. (1973). Antigenic variation in current human type A influenza viruses. Antigenic characteristics of the variants and their geographic distribution. Bulletin of the World Heath Organization 48, 269–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Schulman, J. L. (1967). Experimental transmission of influenza virus infection in mice. III. Differing effects of immunity induced by infection and by inactivated influenza virus vaccine on transmission of infection. Journal of Experimental Medicine 125, 467–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, J. L. & Kilbourne, E. D. (1965). Induction of partial specific heterotypic immunity in mice by a single infection with influenza A virus. Journal of Bacteriology 89, 170–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, W., Andrews, C. H. & Laidlaw, P. P. (1933). A virus obtained from influenza patients. Lancet ii, 66–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, G. H. (1966). Immunité croisée hétérotypique chez la souris entre virus grippaux humains de types A et A2. Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'académie des Sciences Paris 264, 1913–16.Google Scholar