Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:32:18.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II. Note on the species of fleas found upon rats, Mus rattus and Mus decumanus, in different parts of the world, and on some variations in the proportion of each species in different localities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Hon. N. Charles Rothschild
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ceratophyllus fasciatus1 is the flea usually found on Mus decumanus in Great Britain, and this is also the case, apparently, throughout Northern and Central Europe. The common house mouse, Mus musculus, occasionally harbours this parasite also, though its usual flea is Ctenopsylla musculi.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 6 , Issue 4: Extra “Plague Number” , September 1906 , pp. 483 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

References

Gauthier, and Raybaud, (1903), Recherches expérimentales sur le rôle des parasites du rat dans la transmission de la peste. Revue d'hygiène, xxv. p. 426.Google Scholar
Giles, G. M. (1905), Pulex cheopis, Rothschild, in England. Entomol. Monthly Mag. vol. XLI. p. 139.Google Scholar
Herzog, M. (1904), The Plague: Bacteriology, Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, including a consideration of insects as plague carries. Manila Government Bulletin, No. 25483.Google Scholar
Herzog, M. (1905), Zur Frage der Pestverbreitung durch Insecten. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, vol. LI. p. 268.Google Scholar
Rothschild, (1903), New species of Siphonaptera from Egypt and the Sudan. Entomol. Monthly Mag. vol. XXXIX. p. 83.Google Scholar
Tidswell, F. (1903), Report on the Second Outbreak of Plague at Sydney, 1902, by Ashburton Thompson, p. 71.Google Scholar
Tiraboschi, C. (1904), Les Rats, les Souris et leurs parasites cutanes dans leurs rapports avec la propagation de la peste bubonique. Archives de Parasit. vol. VIII. p. 161.Google Scholar