Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:36:27.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human physiology under high pressure: I. Effects of Nitrogen, Carbon dioxide, and Cold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. M. Case  and
J. B. S. Haldane
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We confirm the finding of Behnke, et al. (1935) that air at 8·6 atm. pressure has a somewhat intoxicating effect on human beings, and that this effect is due to nitrogen. The nitrogen effect reaches its maximum after about 3 min. There was no reduction of manual dexterity in the test used by us, but a considerable effect on performance of arithmetic, and on most practical activities. At 10 atm. these effects were somewhat enhanced, and manual dexterity was lowered in some cases. When helium or hydrogen was substituted for nitrogen there was no intoxication.

3–4% of carbon dioxide at atmospheric pressure caused no deterioration in manual or arithmetical skill, and in the two subjects tested, 6% of carbon dioxide caused no deterioration.

When air containing about 0·4% of carbon dioxide, and therefore with a partial pressure of about 4%, was breathed at 10 atm., there was a marked deterioration in manual dexterity, and a good deal of confusion. When breathing carbon dioxide at partial pressures of 6·6–9·7% at 10. atm., eight subjects lost consciousness in 1–5 min., but some could tolerate partial pressures of over 8% for 5 min. or more. With half an hour's exposure to a partial pressure of 6–7% of carbon dioxide, one subject lost consciousness after 7 min. at 10 atm. pressure, and another nearly did so.

We consider that the percentage of carbon dioxide in air at 10 atm. pressure should be kept below 0·3%. Exposure to high partial pressures of carbon dioxide at 10 atm. does not increase the liability to ‘bends’ or other symptoms due to rapid decompression.

Immersion in water below 40° F. did not enhance the effects of high-pressure air, or of carbon dioxide at atmospheric pressure, but somewhat enhanced those of high pressure and carbon dioxide together.

In certain breathing apparatus the resistance became so great at 10 atm. as to be intolerable.

Few subjects experienced serious trouble during compression, or during or after decompression. But one developed a unilateral pneumothorax.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , November 1941 , pp. 225 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, H. E. (1908). Low temperature research at the Royal Institution. Proc. Roy. Instn, 19, 354.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R., Thomson, R. M. & Motley, E. P. (1935). Psychologic effects of breathing air at 4 atmospheres' pressure. Amer. J. Physiol. 112, 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, A. R., Thomson, R. M. & Shaw, L. A. (1935). The rate of elimination of dissolved nitrogen in man in relation to the fat and water content of the body. Amer. J. Physiol. 114, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, A. R. & Willmon, T. L. (1939). U.S.S. Squalus. Medical aspects of the rescue and salvage operations, and the use of oxygen in deep-sea diving. U.S. Nav. Med. Bull. 37, 629.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R. & Yarbrough, O. D. (1938). Physiologic studies of helium. U.S. Nav. Med. Bull. 36, 542.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R. & Yarbrough, O. D. (1939). Respiratory resistance, oil-water solubility, and mental effects of argon, compared with helium and nitrogen. Amer. J. Physiol. 126, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boycott, A. E., Damant, G. C. C. & Haldane, J. S. (1908). The prevention of compressed air illness. J. Hyg., Camb., 8, 342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damant, G. C. C. (1930). Physiological effects of work in compressed air. Nature, Lond., 126 (2), 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H. (1935). Deep Diving and Submarine Operations. London.Google Scholar
End, E. (1937). Rapid decompression following inhalation of helium-oxygen mixtures under pressure. Amer. J. Physiol. 120, 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
End, E. (1938). The use of new equipment and helium gas in a world record dive. J. Ind. Hyg. Tox. 20, 511.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1924). Über Halluzinationen infolge von Änderungen des Kohlensäuredrucks. Psychol. Forschung, 5, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, J. H., Sayers, R. R. & Yant, W. P. (1928). Helium in deep diving and caisson working. Nature, Lond., 121, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. & Phillips, A. E. (1932). Deep-sea diving. J. Boy. Nav. Med. Ser., Lond., 18, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. E. (1932). Recent research work in deep sea diving. Proc. roy. Soc. Med. 25, 693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidell, Atherton (1940). Solubilities of Inorganic and Metal Organic Compounds. New York.Google Scholar
Shilling, C. W. & Willgrube, W. W. (1937). Quantitative study of mental and neuro-muscular reactions as influenced by increased air pressure. U.S. Nav. Med. Bull. 35, 373.Google Scholar
Ubbelohde, L. & Svanoe, T. (1919). Z. angew. Chem. 32, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar