Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:18:23.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth under Vita Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Ian N. Sutherland
Affiliation:
From the Usher Institute of Public Health, Edinburgh University.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

White rats reared from the age of 30 days to 275 days under vita glass, and properly fed, do not grow at a different rate from those reared under ordinary glass.

The offspring of these rats, kept in the same environment, grow at the normal rate when compared with controls born and reared under ordinary window glass.

A short discussion of these results is given in the text.

Addendum. The temptation to use an artificial source of ultra-violet rays having proved irresistible, a further experiment was performed with 20 males, 10 under vita glass and 10 under window glass. These were exposed to the radiation of a Hanovia quartz mercury vapour lamp on alternate days, at a distance of four feet from the burner. The growth curves are shown on Chart V, and the lengths of exposure have been entered on this chart: it will be seen that the results are the same as with natural sunlight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ferguson, J. Bell (1926). The Quartz Mercury Vapour Lamp, p. 55. (H. K. Lewis.)Google Scholar
(2)Paul, H. (1928). County Borough of Smethwick: Report of the School Medical Officer on Experiments in the Use of Vita Glass.Google Scholar
(3)Sherman, H. C. and Crocker, J. (1922). J. Biol. Chem. 53, 49.Google Scholar
(4)Donaldson, H. H. (1924). The Rat, p. 276. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(5)Greenman, M. J. and Duhring, F. L. (1923), Breeding and Care of the Albino Rat for Research Purposes. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(6)Osborne, T. B., Mendel, L. B. and Cannon, Helen C. (1926). J. Biol. Chem. 69, 661;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, and Cannon, (1927). J. Biol. Chem. 75, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Brown, W. H. (1928). J. Exper. Med. 48, 31; J. Exper. Med. 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Mackay, Helen M. M. (1927). Arch. Dis. in Childhood, 2, 231.Google Scholar
(9)Colebrook, Dora (1929). Med. Res. Council Spec. Rep. No. 131.Google Scholar
(10)Cassie, Ethel and Cox, Ursula (1930). Lancet, i, 878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Pearce, L. and van Allen, C. M. (1926). J. Exper. Med. 44, 447, 461, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Kroetz, C. (1927). Arch. f. Exper. Path. u. Pharm. 120, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Mayerson, H. S., Gunther, L. and Laurens, H. (19251926). Amer. J. Physiol. 75, 399, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Campbell, J. A. (1926). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 99, 451.Google Scholar
(15)Mason, E. H. and Mason, H. H. (1927). Arch. Int. Med. 39, 317.Google Scholar
(16)Crofts, E. (1928). Amer. J. Hyg. 8, 1020.Google Scholar
(17)Gage, H. P. (1930). Trans. Ilium. Eng. Soc. 25, 337.Google Scholar
(18)Greider, C. E. and Downes, A. C. (1930). Trans. Ilium. Eng. Soc. 25, 378.Google Scholar
(19)Goodman, H. and Anderson, W. T. (1928). Boston Med. and Surg. J. 197, 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Hill, L. (1927). Brit. J. Actinother. 2, 143.Google Scholar
(21)Lamplough, F. E. (1928). Brit. J. Tuberculosis, 22, 49.Google Scholar
(22)Meded. Rijks-Inst. Pharm. Therap. Onderzoek. 1927, No. 13, 131. (Abstract by A. Charlotte Ruys in Bull. Hyg. 1928, 3, 27.)Google Scholar
(23)Peemoller, F. and Dannmeyer, F. (1927). Med. Klin. 23, 1097.Google Scholar
(24)Coblentz, W. W. (1930). Trans. Ilium. Eng. Soc. 25, 359.Google Scholar
(25)Tisdall, F. F. and Brown, A. (1927). Amer. J. Dis. Child. 34, 742.Google Scholar
(26)Luckiesh, M. (1930). Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. 25, 370 (discussion): full report in J. Opt. Soc. of Amer. 1929, 19, 1.Google Scholar
(27)Eddy, W. H. (1928). Amer. J. Pub. H. 18, 1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(28)Clark, Janet (1928). Science, 68, 165.Google Scholar
(29)Eidinow, A. (1925). Lancet, ii. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(30)Eidinow, A. (1926). Lancet, ii, 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(31)Hausmann, W. and Krumpel, O. (1927). Strahlentherapie, 27, 386.Google Scholar
(32)Beckett, H. E. (1930). Ultra-violet Window Glazing: Dept. of Sci. and Indust. Res., Building Research Bulletin, No. 8, p. 5.Google Scholar