Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:21:30.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A group of viruses isolated from naturally infected mosquitoes collected in the Murray Valley area of Victoria and New South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. L. French  and
W. C. Reeves
E. L. French
Affiliation:
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Melbourne, and the George Williams Hooper Foundation of Medical Research and the School of Public Health, University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, California
W. C. Reeves
Affiliation:
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Melbourne, and the George Williams Hooper Foundation of Medical Research and the School of Public Health, University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By the inoculation of suspensions of mosquitoes on the chorio-allantoic membrane of chick embryos, seven pock-producing viruses have been isolated. The mosquitoes were collected in a small area of the Murray Valley situated in the north-western corner of Victoria and southern New South Wales. Six of the viruses were isolated from pools of C. fatigans and one from a pool of C. annulirostris. Five of the viruses were found to be members of the bird pox group and related to fowl-pox virus. Two of the viruses differed in the type of pock they produced on the chorio-allantoic membrane and appeared to be serologically unrelated to the other five.

The interest and criticism of Sir Macfarlane Burnet, F.R.S., throughout the conduct of this work is gratefully acknowledged.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , December 1954 , pp. 551 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

Anderson, S. G., Donnelley, M., Stevenson, W. J., Caldwell, N. J. & Eagle, M. (1952). Murray Valley encephalitis: surveys of human and animal sera. Med. J. Aust. 1, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, W. I. B. & Bubnet, F. M. (1946). The cultivation of viruses and rickettsia in the chick embryo. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 256.Google Scholar
Brody, A. L. (1936). Mem. Cornell agric. Exp. Sta. no. 195.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1933). A virus disease of the canary of the fowl-pox group. J. Path. Bact. 37, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, F. M. & Lush, D. (1936). The immunological relationship between Kikuth's canary virus and fowl pox. Brit. J. exp. Path. 17, 302.Google Scholar
Fenner, F., Day, M. F. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1952). The mechanism of the transmission of myxomatosis in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 30, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, E. L. (1952). Murray Valley encephalitis: isolation and characterization of the aetiological agent. Med. J. Aust. 1, 100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kligler, J. J. & Ashner, M. (1929). Transmission of fowl pox by mosquitoes: further observations. Brit. J. exp. Path. 10, 347.Google Scholar
Kligler, J. J. & Ashner, M. (1931). Demonstration of presence of fowl pox virus in wild caught mosquitoes (Culex pipiens). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 28, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, N. C., French, E. L., Marks, E. N. & Kent, N. E. (1954). Murray Valley encephalitis: a survey of suspected mosquito vectors. Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 3, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed