Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:33:06.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Graphic method of constructing a Life Table illustrated by the Brighton Life Table, 1891—1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Arthur Newsholme  and
T. H. C. Stevenson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

(1) The graphic method is more easy of application and requires less mathematical knowledge than the extended analytical method.

(2) In our experience it produces smooth curves of px and Ex.

(3) The analytical in the selection of the best process of interpolation appeals to the graphic method.

(4) While either the analytical or graphic process may in unskilful or careless hands give erroneous results, owing to errors in working out, the analytical process, unlike the graphic, presents a wide choice of methods, which although accurately worked out, give incomparable results.

(5) The facts given in the table on page 321 and in Fig. 1 A and B and table on page 317 show that almost identical results are obtained by the graphic method and by the improved extended analytical method. We regard this as important testimony to the accuracy of each of these methods, and at the same time as indicating the inaccuracy of the analytical methods giving different results.

(6) As the results obtained by the modified short analytical method and by the combined analytical and graphic method approximate so closely to those obtained by the detailed graphic method, either of them may safely be adopted by those who cannot spare time for working out a detailed Life Table by the graphic method.

(7) Every published Life Table should give exact details of the method of its construction, in order that the comparability of data and results may be tested. Much confusion has arisen, and important errors in comparison between different Life Tables have been produced, by the use of different methods of construction and the non-publication of details of methods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , July 1903 , pp. 297 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1903

References

REFERENCES

(1)The Brighton Life Table (Based on the Mortality of Ten Years 1881—1890), and the Elements of Vital Statistics, 3rd Ed. page 265. A. Newsholme.Google Scholar
(2) “On the Method used by Milne in the Construction of the Carlisle Table of Mortality.” G. King, F.I.A., Journal Inst. Actuaries, No. CXXXI. (10. 1883).Google Scholar
(3) “On the Construction and Use of Life Tables from a Public Health Point of View.” T. E. Hayward, M.B. &c., Journal of Hygiene, Vol. II. No. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
(4) “A Method for Estimating Mean Populations in the Last Intercensal Period.” A. C. Waters, Journal Statistical Society, Vol. LXIV. Part IL., 1901.Google Scholar
(5) “On the Construction of Life Tables, illustrated by a new Life Table of the Healthy Districts of England.” W. Farr, M.D., F.R.S., Philos. Trans. 1860, reprinted in Journal Inst. Actuaries, Vol. IX. Part III., p. 122.Google Scholar
(6)Hayward, . Journal of Hygiene, Vol. II. No. 1, p. 12.Google Scholar
(7) Hayward. page 34.Google Scholar
(8) Hayward. page 40.Google Scholar
(9) Hayward. Journal of Hygiene, Vol. II. No. 2, p. 207.Google Scholar
(10) Hayward. Journal of Hygiene, Vol. II. No. 1, page 28.Google Scholar
(11) Hayward. Journal Royal Statistical Society, Vol. LXII. Part III., 1899.Google Scholar
(12) The London Life Table (Based on the Mortality in the Decennium 1891—1900). Shirley F. Murphy.Google Scholar
(13) Decennial Supplement to the Report of the Registrar-General 1881—1990. Dr Tatham, Vol. I. page ix.Google Scholar
(14) Hayward. Journal Royal Statistical Society, Vol. LXIV. Part IV. p. 640.Google Scholar