Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:38:43.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further studies with a diphtheria–tetanus–poliomyelitis vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Margaret Haire ,
David S. Dane ,
George Dick ,
E. Moya Briggs  and
T. J. Connor
Margaret Haire
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
David S. Dane
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
George Dick
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
E. Moya Briggs
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
T. J. Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The efficiency of a diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis vaccine in inducing a serological response after a three-dose primary course of immunization was tested in thirty-nine children aged 5 and 6 years and found to be satisfactory. This vaccine had previously been shown to be suitable for use as a single dose reinforcing vaccine for children of this age who had been immunized in infancy. It is suggested that all children might receive one dose of the vaccine at the time they enter school, and then those who have not been immunized before should receive a further two suitably spaced doses to complete their course of primary immunization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 485 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Beale, A. J. & Mason, P. J. (1962). The measurement of the D-antigen in poliovirus preparations. J. Hyg., Camb. 60, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, Sir John (1959). Proceedings of a Symposium on Immunization in Childhood, p. 81. Ed. Cannon, D. A., Coekburn, W. C., Evans, D. G. and Parish, H. J.. Edinburgh and London: E. and S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Dane, D. S., Dick, G. W. A., Haire, M.Briggs, E. M. & Connor, T. J. (1965). A diphtheriatetanus–poliomyelitis vaccine. Lancet i, 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. G. & Smith, J. W. G. (1963). Response of the young infant to active immunization. Br. med. Bull. 19, no. 3, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health (1963). Active Immunization against Infectious Disease, p. 2.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (1965). Circular, 8 September 65. C.M.O. 14/65.Google Scholar
Perkins, F. T. & Evans, D. G. (1959). British standard poliomyelitis antisera types 1, 2 and 3. Br. med. J. i, 1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report (1959). Vaccination against whooping cough. The final report to the whooping cough immunization committee of the Medical Research Council. Br. med. J. i, 994.Google Scholar
Report (1962). Inefficiency of purified diphtheria formol toxoid in primary immunization against diphtheria. A report to the Medical Research Council by its committee on diphtheria toxoid. Br. med. J. ii, 149.Google Scholar