Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:43:38.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency of rubella antibodies among adult population in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

George J. Papaevangelou
George J. Papaevangelou
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens 606, Greece
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

No significant sex difference in the incidence of immunity to rubella at the ages of 20–25 was found in a comparative study of young adults from the Greater Athens area as well as from the rural department of Corinthia. The immunity to rubella of Greek adults on a national scale was then studied in a respresentative sample of 1200 males 20–25 years old. In 83·2% of them neutralizing antibodies to rubella were detected. A statistically higher proportion of immunes was found among those from urban areas. The factors responsible for the relative prevalence of immunity to rubella in various population groups are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , June 1969 , pp. 175 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Brody, J. A., Sever, J. L., McAlister, R., Schiff, G. M. & Cutting, R. (1965). Rubella epidemic on St Paul Island in the Pribilofs, 1963. Epidemiologic, clinical and serologic findings. J. Am. med. Ass. 191, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, J. A. (1966). The infectiousness of rubella and the possibility of reinfection. Am. J. publ. Hlth 191, 1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. M. (1967). The occurrence of neutralizing and complement fixing antibodies in rubella. J. Hyg., Camb. 65, 409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregg, N. M. (1941). Congenital cataract following German measles in the mother. Trans. ophthal. Soc. Aust. 3, 35.Google Scholar
Leehrøy, J. (1966). Neutralization of rubella virus in a rabbit cornea cell line (SIRC). Acta path. microbiol. scand 67, 158.Google Scholar
Miller, C. H., Dowd, J. M., Rytel, M. W., Miller, L. F. & Pierce, W. E. (1967). Prevention of rubella with γglobulin. J. Am. med. Ass. 201, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaevangelou, G. J. (1967). The serologically detected immunity to rubella among Greek adults. Aesculapious, Athens.Google Scholar
Parkman, P. D., Meyer, H. M., Kirschstein, R. L. & Hopps, H. E. (1966). Attenuated rubella virus. New Engl. J. Med. 275, 569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, W. E. (1967). In Miller et al. (1967).Google Scholar
Plotkin, S. A., Farquhar, J., Katz, M. & Ingalls, T. H. (1967). A new attenuated rubella virus grown in human fibroblasts: evidence for reduced nasopharyngeal excretion. Am. J. Epidem. 86, 468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, W. E. et al. (1967). WHO Collaborative study on the seroepidemiology of rubella. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 37, 79.Google Scholar
Rubella Symposium (1965). Am. J. Dis. Child. 110, no. 4.Google Scholar
Sever, J. L., Schiff, G. M. & Huebner, R. J. (1964). Frequency of rubella antibody among pregnant women and other human and animal populations. Obstet. Gynec., N. Y. 23, 153.Google ScholarPubMed
Schiff, G. M. & Sever, J. L. (1966). Rubella: recent laboratory and clinical advances. Prog. med. Virol. 8, 30.Google ScholarPubMed