Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:45:27.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field trials of second-generation anticoagulants against difenacoum-resistant Norway rat populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

J. H. Greaves ,
D. S. Shepherd  and
R. Quy
J. H. Greaves
Affiliation:
Tolworth Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surrey KT6 7NF
D. S. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Tolworth Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surrey KT6 7NF
R. Quy
Affiliation:
Tolworth Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surrey KT6 7NF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Trials of rodenticidal baits containing 50 p.p.m. difenacoum, 50 p.p.m. bromadiolone or 20 p.p.m. brodifacoum were carried out on farmsteads against populations of Rattus norvegicus containing difenacoum-resistant individuals. Six difenacoum treatments failed in 14–42 days of baiting. Two treatments with bromadiolone succeeded in 23 and 33 days, but four further treatments lasting 35–56 days failed to eradicate the populations. Brodifacoum gave virtually complete control of six populations in 21–73 days and of the ten residual populations left behind by the other two compounds, after baiting for a further 11–85 days. The performance of both bromadiolone and brodifacoum was well below that reported by previous investigators, indicating the possibility of low-grade resistance to these compounds in the difenacoum-resistant strain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 295 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Chitty, D. (1942). A relative census method for brown rats (Rattus norvegicus). Nature, London 150, 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, D. C. & Rennison, B. D. (1973). The detection of rodent resistance to anticoagulants. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 239–242.Google ScholarPubMed
Dubock, A. C. & Kaukeinen, D. E. (1978). Brodifacoum (Talon rodenticide), a novel concept.Proceedings of the 8th Vertebrate Pest Conference,Sacramento, California,127–137.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. H., Shepherd, D. S. & Gill, J. E. (1982). An investigation of difenacoum resistance in Norway rat populations in Hampshire. Annals of Applied Biology 100, 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, M. (1977). New rodenticides against anticoagulant-resistant rats and mice. Bulletin of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization 7, 503–508.Google Scholar
Redfern, R. & Gill, J. E. (1980). Laboratory evaluation of bromadiolone as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene. 84, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redfern, R., Gill, J. E. & Hadler, M. R. (1976). Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 77, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D. (1977). Methods of testing rodenticides in the field against rats. Pesticide Science 8, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, B. D. & Dubock, A. C. (1978). Field trials of WBA 8119 (PP 581, brodifacoum) against warfarin-resistant infestations of Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 80, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. G. J. (1981). Field trials of bromadiolone against infestations of warfarin-resistant Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 86, 363–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed