Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:36:15.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field trials of brodifacoum (WBA 8119) against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. P. Rowe
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
T. Swinney
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
C. Plant
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum was tested against house mice (Mus musculus L.) infesting farm buildings. In six trials, treatment success was assessed from the results of census baitings conducted before and after treatment. With 0·005% brodifacoum in canary seed/corn oil bait, the control achieved ranged between 92·7% and 100%, mean 98·8%. Two mouse populations were eradicated in 3 to 4 weeks but a few individuals survived each of the other four treatments which lasted 6 weeks. The effectiveness of brodifacoum against mice is compared with that of 0·1% calciferol and 0·025% warfarin in combination. It is concluded that brodifacoum and calciferol/warfarin are equally effective in controlling M. musculus but that brodifacoum treatments need to be conducted fora relatively longer period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Redfern, R., Gill, J. E. & Hadler, M. R. (1976). Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 77, 419–26.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P., Bradfield, A. & Redfern, R. (1974). Food preferences of wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 473–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, F. P. & Bradfield, A. (1975). Comparative acute and chronic toxicity tests on confined colonies of wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Proceedings of the Fourth British Pest Control Conference,St Helier, Jersey. Paper 19, 16.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P. & Bradfield, A. (1976). Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticide WBA 8119 against confined colonies of warfarin-resistant house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 77, 427–31.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P. & Redfern, R. (1965). Toxicity tests on suspected warfarin resistant house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 63, 417–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, F. P., Smith, F. J. & Swinney, T. (1974). Field trials of calciferol combined with warfarin against wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, F. P. & Swinney, T. (1977). Population dynamics of small rodents in farm buldings and on arable land. EPPO Bulletin 7 (2), 431–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, F. P., Swinney, T. & Bradfield, A. (1974). Field trials of the rodenticide 5-p-chlorophenyl silatrane against wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 4952.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P., Swinney, T. & Bradfield, A. (1975). Field trials of the rodenticide gophacide against wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 74, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southern, H. N. (1954). Control of rats and mice, vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar