Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:01:07.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field trials of a new sub-acute rodenticide flupropadine, against wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

A. P. Buckle
A. P. Buckle
Affiliation:
Tolworth Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surrey KT6 7NF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fifteen experimental treatments with rodenticidal baits containing 0·1, 0·15 or 0·2% flupropadine were conducted on farmsteads against Raltus norvegicus infestations. Eight treatments were completely successful and the others gave kills ranging from 36 to 72% in 28 days. Treatments with 0·1 and 0·15% flupropadine were less successful against large infestations than against small ones. Flupropadine was most successful at 0·2% but still gave incomplete kills on farms where abundant alternative food was available. The compound was more effective than acute poisons in achieving complete control of Norway rat infestations, but was less reliable in doing so than anticoagulants. On the other hand, many flupropadine treatments gave quicker control and used smaller quantities of bait than anticoagulant treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 505 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Boyle, C. M. (1960). Case of apparent resistance of Rattus norvegirus Berkenhout to anticoagulant poisons. Nature, London188, 517.Google Scholar
Drummond, D. C. & Rennison, B. D. (1973). The detection of rodent resistance to anticoagulants. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 48, 230–242.Google ScholarPubMed
Grand, M. (1976). Experimental data on a new anticoagulant raticide: hromadiolone. Phytiatric-Phytopharmacie 25, 69–88.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. H. & Rennison, B. D. (1973). Population aspects of warfarin resistance in the Brown rat, Rattus norveginut. Mammal Review 3, 27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, J. H., Shepherd, D. S. & Qry, R. (1982). Field trials of second-generation anticoagulants against difenaeoum-resistant Norway rat populations. Journal of Hygiene 89. 205–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadler, M. R. & Shadbolt, R. S. (1975). Novel 4-hydroxycoumarin anticoagulants active against resistant rats. Nature, London 253, 275–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D. (1974a). Field trialsof calciferol against warfarin resistant infestations of Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, B. D. (1974b). Field trials of the rodenticide 5-p-chlorophenyl silatrane against wild rats (Rattus norvegicus Berk.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D. (1976). A comparative field trial, conducted without pretreatment census baiting, of the rodenticides zinc phosphide, thallium sulphate and gophacide against Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 77, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D. & Duhock, A. C. (1978). Field trials of WBA 8119 (pp581, brodifacoum) against warfarin-resistant infestations of Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 80, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. G. J. (1981). Field trialsof bromadiolone against infestations of warfarin-resistant Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 86, 363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, D. S. & Greaves, J. H. (1984). A weather-resistant tracking board.. Proceedings of the 11th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Sacramento, U.S.A., 6–8 03 1984. (In the Press.)Google Scholar