Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:16:07.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The fall and rise of Group A Streptococcus diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2018

T. C. Barnett*
Affiliation:
Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
A. C. Bowen
Affiliation:
Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
J. R. Carapetis
Affiliation:
Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: T. C. Barnett, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Streptococcus pyogenes (or Group A Streptococcus, GAS) is a Gram-positive human pathogen responsible for a diverse array of superficial, invasive and immune-related diseases. GAS infections have historically been diseases of poverty and overcrowding, and remain a significant problem in the developing world and in disadvantaged populations within developed countries. With improved living conditions and access to antibiotics, the rates of GAS diseases in developed societies have gradually declined during the 20th century. However, genetic changes in circulating GAS strains and/or changes in host susceptibility to infection can lead to dramatic increases in the rates of specific diseases. No situations exemplify this more than the global upsurge of invasive GAS disease that originated in the 1980s and the regional increases in scarlet fever in north-east Asia and the UK. In each case, increased disease rates have been associated with the emergence of new GAS strains with increased disease-causing capability. Global surveillance for new GAS strains with increased virulence is important and determining why certain populations suddenly become susceptible to circulating strains remains a research priority. Here, we overview the changing epidemiology of GAS infections and the genetic alterations that accompany the emergence of GAS strains with increased capacity to cause disease.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

Introduction

Streptococcus pyogenes, also known as the Group A Streptococcus (GAS), is a remarkable human pathogen that causes a diverse spectrum of disease [Reference Walker1]. The majority of GAS diseases are relatively mild, superficial infections of the throat (pharyngitis, or ‘Strep throat’) and skin (impetigo, or ‘skin sores’). A rare, yet serious, consequence of these superficial infections occurs when the infecting strain gains access to deeper tissues, causing invasive infections that include the ‘flesh-eating disease’ necrotizing fasciitis and Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS), both of which have high case fatality rates. Another serious consequence of superficial GAS infections occurs when an abnormal immune response leads to post-streptococcal sequelae. These diseases include Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) and Acute Post-Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis, and can result in the long-term morbidities Rheumatic Heart Disease and chronic kidney disease that account for most of the global disease burden for this pathogen [Reference Carapetis2].

GAS strains are defined by the presence of the group A carbohydrate on their surface and are further classified based on serological or genetic differences in the surface M protein, encoded by the emm gene [Reference Walker1]. Over 220 different emm types have been documented and remarkable differences in emm type prevalence exist in different populations [Reference Steer3]. In particular, the dominant circulating emm types in industrialised populations are usually different and much less diverse than those that circulate in socio-economically disadvantaged populations (for review see [Reference Steer3]). Genetic differences within an individual emm type are also common, particularly as a result of differences in prophage (a bacteriophage genome inserted into the bacterial genome) gene content, or as a result of other horizontal gene transfer events [Reference Musser and Shelburne4].

Globally, GAS ranks in the top 10 infectious causes of human mortality, and a 2005 study attributed at least 517 000 patient deaths each year to this pathogen [Reference Carapetis2]. The majority of disease occurs in socio-economically disadvantaged populations in low and middle income (developing) countries, where overcrowding, poor nutrition and reduced living standards are thought to contribute to endemic GAS disease [Reference Carapetis2, Reference Ralph and Carapetis5]. Similar living conditions were prevalent in industrialised (developed) countries during the 19th and early 20th centuries when diseases such as scarlet fever and ARF were a considerable cause of morbidity and mortality [Reference Ralph and Carapetis5Reference Quinn7]. In England in the mid-19th century, scarlet fever mortality at its peak was 174 per 100 000 across all age groups, with mortality in children less than 5 as high as 419 per 100 000 [Reference Radcliffe8]. Scarlet fever was thus a greatly feared and fatal infectious disease, and children were admitted to hospitals in large numbers to manage symptoms and reduce transmission [Reference Lamagni9]. A similar high burden of ARF was seen in hospitals in industrialised contexts prior to the 1960s, after which rates began to decline to their current levels [Reference Steer10].

In industrialised countries, the burden of GAS disease in affluent populations has gradually decreased since the latter part of the 19th century as living conditions improved [Reference Ralph and Carapetis5], but with persistence in disadvantaged populations within these countries [Reference May, Bowen and Carapetis11, Reference Carapetis12]. Improved sanitation, development of antibiotics and a reduction in poverty and household overcrowding have often been used to explain this decrease [Reference Ralph and Carapetis5, Reference Quinn7, Reference Lamagni9]. In recent years, however, a global resurgence of invasive infections and regional outbreaks of diseases such as scarlet fever have exacerbated public health concerns. In this review, we use the examples of invasive GAS infections and scarlet fever to highlight how genetic changes can lead to the emergence of new GAS strains with increased disease-causing potential. Much of what we know about these processes has come from a wealth of genome sequencing studies of isolates associated with disease emergence in industrialised populations. However, the precise host–pathogen interactions that contribute to each of these diseases are still being described and remain a research priority.

Invasive GAS infections

Defined as infection of a normally sterile site, invasive GAS (iGAS) infections comprise a diverse array of severe diseases that include necrotising fasciitis, bacteraemia, STSS, pneumonia and cellulitis [Reference Walker1]. Beginning in the late 1980s, a marked increase in the number of iGAS infections was observed in the USA and Europe [Reference Kaplan13]. While this initial upsurge is believed to have been associated with the emergence of more virulent strains (e.g. M1T1), multiple emm types have been found to comprise iGAS infections in industrialised societies. A recent comprehensive study from the USA documented 99 unique emm types amongst 9557 iGAS infections; emm types 1, 12, 28, 89 and 3 were responsible for over half of these infections and emm1 was the most prevalent causing approximately one in five infections [Reference Nelson14]. A similar distribution of emm types associated with iGAS infections has been reported in other industrialised regions, including Europe [Reference Gherardi, Vitali and Creti15] and Australia [Reference O'Grady16], while a broader range of emm types are associated with these infections in developing populations [Reference Steer3]. The emm types that dominate in industrialised countries are often not as prominent in low- and middle-income countries [Reference Steer3].

Genetic changes associated with the emergence of iGAS strains

Recent genomic analyses of iGAS isolates from industrialised populations have identified conserved and emm type-specific features that likely have contributed to the emergence of these infections since the 1980s. These will be discussed below using the examples emm1, emm3 and emm89 strains (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Evolutionary pathway of M1T1, emm3 and emm89 GAS strains with increased capacity to cause iGAS infections. For each example, multiple genetic events involving prophage acquisition, recombination and/or point mutations have resulted in contemporary strains with increased disease-causing capacity. Estimated dates for these events are provided for the M1T1 iGAS clone (data from [Reference Nasser21]).

In industrialised settings, emm1 strains are the most common emm type associated with iGAS infections in most epidemiological investigations [Reference Nelson14Reference Luca-Harari17]. Molecular typing [Reference Chatellier18] and whole genome sequencing [Reference Sumby19Reference Nasser21] studies have revealed that a single clone (the so-called M1T1 clone) is responsible for almost all contemporary emm1 infections since the global upsurge of disease in the 1980s. Compared with ancestral emm1 strains (i.e. those isolated prior to this upsurge of disease), three separate genetic events define the M1T1 clone: acquisition of a prophage encoding a deoxyribonuclease (DNase) enzyme (Sda1, also called SdaD2) that has been shown to promote resistance to neutrophils; acquisition of the SpeA2 superantigen that has been proposed to aid pharyngeal colonisation; and a recombination event that replaces the chromosomal region encoding the secreted toxins NAD glycohydrolase (NAG) and Streptolysin O (SLO), which have been shown to mediate resistance to host polymorphonuclear cells [Reference Sumby19, Reference Maamary20]. The recombination of the NAG-SLO region was recently identified as the final genetic event that led to the emergence of the M1T1 clone in the early 1980s [Reference Nasser21]. As this region is conserved in other emm types commonly isolated from iGAS infections (e.g. 12, 89, 3), it has been proposed to constitute a key molecular event in the emergence of GAS strains with increased invasive disease capacity [Reference Nasser21, Reference Chochua22].

NAD glycohydrolase and Streptolysin O

SLO and NAG are a pair of co-transcribed secreted toxins that act synergistically to trigger cell death [Reference Timmer23, Reference Chandrasekaran and Caparon24]. SLO is a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin that inserts into the eukaryotic cell membrane, where it has been shown to facilitate translocation of NAG into the host cell [Reference Madden, Ruiz and Caparon25]. Two variants of NAG exist in different strains [Reference Riddle, Bessen and Caparon26, Reference Chandrasekaran27], a NADase-active variant that triggers cell death through depletion of NAD+, and a NADase-inactive variant that triggers cell death via programmed necrosis [Reference Chandrasekaran and Caparon24]. The recombination of the NAG-SLO region in the M1T1 clone resulted in three polymorphisms that increase the expression of the NAG and SLO toxins, and converted NAG to the NADase-active form [Reference Zhu28]. For M1T1 GAS, these changes were shown to convey increased resistance to killing by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and increased virulence in animal models of pharyngitis and necrotising fasciitis [Reference Zhu28], suggesting that the NADase-active form contributes to increased GAS survival in sterile sites. Whether the NADase-active variant also directly influences disease severity in iGAS infections remains to be determined.

emm type-specific changes

In addition to the replacement of the NAG-SLO gene region described above, some emm types frequently associated with iGAS infections have undergone additional genetic events that have contributed to their emergence. These changes will be discussed below using the examples of M1T1, emm3 and emm89 strains.

M1T1

In addition to its prevalence with iGAS infections, the M1T1 clone is also the most common strain associated with superficial pharyngeal disease in industrialised populations. This capacity, in part, has been attributed to the acquisition of the prophage-encoded SpeA2 allele. Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis suggested that acquisition of SpeA2 in the 1980s provided a powerful selection advantage that led to the global dissemination of the M1T1 clone [Reference Maamary20]. SpeA2 differs from SpeA1 by a single amino acid change that results in significantly higher affinity for major histocompatibility complex class II HLA-DQ molecules [Reference Kline and Collins29]. While SpeA2 did not confer an increased ability to adhere to epithelial cells [Reference Maamary20], SpeA1 has been shown to convey an increased ability of M18 GAS to colonise the nasopharynx of HLA-transgenic mice [Reference Kasper30]. This phenotype was recently shown to be dependent on the presence of specific SpeA-responsive Vβ-specific T cells, suggesting that GAS uses SpeA (or superantigens in general) to manipulate Vβ-specific T cells in the nasopharyngeal environment to promote colonisation [Reference Zeppa31].

The transition of M1T1 GAS from superficial to invasive disease is facilitated by spontaneous mutations in the genes encoding the CovR/S two-component global regulatory system (reviewed in [Reference Cole32]). This ‘invasive switch’ results in abolished SpeB protease expression, along with concomitant strong transcriptional upregulation of multiple virulence-associated genes that are required for growth in sterile sites, including the nag, slo and speA2 genes described above [Reference Sumby33]. Also upregulated by CovR/S mutations are genes encoding M protein, capsule, a streptococcal inhibitor of complement (SIC), and interleukin-8 protease (SpyCEP/ScpC), all of which have documented roles in invasive disease pathogenesis [Reference Cole32]. In addition to the above, upregulation of the prophage-encoded DNase Sda1 was shown to be an important requirement for invasive disease and the accumulation of CovR/S mutations. Upregulation of Sda1 by CovR/S mutations allows M1T1 GAS to escape the effects of neutrophil-extracellular traps [Reference Buchanan34, Reference Sumby35] and Sda1 mutant strains lose the ability to acquire CovR/S mutations and switch to the invasive phenotype [Reference Walker36]. Thus, the three genetic events that comprise the evolution of the M1T1 GAS clone have led to global dissemination through improved pharyngeal colonisation (via SpeA2), a capacity to switch to a highly-virulent invasive phenotype (via Sda1) and an increased ability to survive in sterile sites (via Sda1, SLO and NAG).

emm3

Unlike M1T1, emm3 GAS strains do not acquire CovR/S mutations as a consequence of an invasive switch [Reference Feng37], but do express high amounts of CovR/S-regulated proteins, including capsule, SLO, NAG and streptokinase, as a consequence of a mutant rocA allele, and this conveys increased survival within whole human blood [Reference Miller38]. Another contrast with the M1T1 clone is that emm3 iGAS strains are not clonal and rapidly evolve into new clones that lead to epidemic waves of disease [Reference Beres39]. Numerous associated genetic changes have been described [Reference Beres39], including mutations in the M3 protein [Reference Beres40], the transcriptional regulators MtsR [Reference Beres41] and RopB [Reference Beres39] and loss or gain of prophages encoding superantigens [Reference Beres40]. Of note, the SpeA superantigen, in particular, has been associated with persistence of emm3 clones, a role reminiscent of SpeA2 in the emergence of the M1T1 clone. Similarly, a 2008 upsurge in iGAS infections in the UK was found to involve a new emm3 clone (ST15 lineage C) with a unique superantigen profile; lineage C strains lost the SSA superantigen and gained SpeC and the DNase Spd1 [Reference Al-Shahib42]. While these changes were not found to influence invasiveness in a mouse model of invasive disease, they did enhance nasopharyngeal infection and shedding [Reference Afshar43], suggesting that the emergence of iGAS infections due to lineage C strains may primarily be associated with increased fitness and transmissibility.

emm89

GAS emm89 strains have been increasingly associated with iGAS infections in the USA, Canada and Europe [Reference Chochua22, Reference Beres44Reference Turner46]. This upsurge has corresponded with the emergence of a new genotypic variant (clade 3), characterised by two recent horizontal gene transfer events: replacement of NAG-SLO and loss of the hasABC gene region encoding the hyaluronic acid capsule [Reference Turner46], an unusual characteristic shared with emm4 and emm22 strains [Reference Flores47]. Clade 3 strains also belong to a different T serotype (T13; T serotype is based on the sequence of the major pilus subunit protein) than the ancestral strain (T11) [Reference Chochua22]. The loss of the capsule biosynthesis genes is particularly intriguing, as capsule production has been shown to be essential for virulence of other GAS serotypes by virtue of its antiphagocytic properties (for review see [Reference Walker1]), and is required for the ability of M1T1 strains to switch to an invasive phenotype [Reference Cole48]. While capsule production appears to be dispensable for invasive infection by emm89 strains when NGA and SLO are highly produced [Reference Zhu28], the selective advantage conveyed by capsule loss in emm89 strains is puzzling and remains to be determined. One possibility is that capsule loss may unmask other virulence determinants essential for iGAS infections by emm89 strains.

Scarlet fever

Scarlet fever is a disease that presents as a characteristic finely-papular erythematous rash, so-called ‘strawberry tongue’ and exudative pharyngitis [Reference Walker1]. While this disease is believed to be toxin-mediated, the toxin responsible for the characteristic rash has not been identified, although superantigens are believed to contribute (see below). Beginning in 2009 in Vietnam [Reference Wong and Yuen49] and subsequently in South Korea, China and Hong Kong in 2011 [Reference Davies50Reference Tse52], the rates of scarlet fever increased dramatically. Rates of disease increased approximately 10-fold in a single year in Hong Kong from 2010 to 2011 [Reference Davies50, Reference Tse52] and have increased over 40-fold in South Korea from 2010 to 2015 [Reference Park51]. Rates in mainland China increased approximately threefold in 2011 [Reference Davies50] and a similar increase was observed in the UK starting in 2014 [Reference Lamagni9]. While the reported magnitudes of disease in China and the UK were lower than in Hong Kong and South Korea, regional hotspots within these countries exhibited similarly high rates of disease [Reference Lamagni9, Reference You53].

The reason for these regional outbreaks of scarlet fever remain unclear; whole genome sequencing of associated GAS strains from Hong Kong and the UK revealed the surprising finding that the outbreak strains were not clonal [Reference Davies50, Reference Chalker54]. While the majority of scarlet fever cases in Hong Kong and China were caused by emm12 organisms [Reference Davies50], cases from the UK were associated with multiple emm types (emm3, emm12, emm1 and emm4 in order of decreasing prevalence [Reference Lamagni9]).

Genetic determinants associated with scarlet fever outbreak strains

While multiclonal, what differentiated the scarlet fever outbreak strains from other circulating strains was the presence of novel prophages encoding the superantigens SSA and SpeC, and the DNase Spd1 (Fig. 2) [Reference Davies50, Reference Tse52, Reference Chalker54, Reference Ben Zakour55]. The ssa gene, in particular, was significantly associated with scarlet fever isolates from Hong Kong [Reference Davies50] and was present in all UK scarlet fever isolates [Reference Chalker54]. Related prophages were found in multiple emm types [Reference Davies50, Reference Chalker54] and evidence suggests that transfer of the prophage ΦHKU.vir from emm12 resulted in the emergence of M1T1 scarlet fever strains [Reference Ben Zakour55]. Likewise, a prophage similar to ΦHKU360.ssa was found in the majority of UK emm12 scarlet fever isolates, as well as a single emm28 isolate [Reference Chalker54]. However, these prophages were not unique to scarlet fever strains and in China and Hong Kong had been circulating for decades prior to the scarlet fever outbreak [Reference Davies50]. Thus, the presence of ssa alone cannot account for the upsurge in scarlet fever. Nonetheless, the high incidence of this gene in scarlet fever isolates belonging to multiple emm types from two distinct geographical regions is remarkable, and determining the contribution of SSA to scarlet fever pathogenesis will be important for monitoring the emergence of this disease in other populations.

Fig. 2. Evolutionary pathway of GAS strains with increased capacity to cause Scarlet Fever. Prophage acquisition of the superantigen SSA has resulted in contemporary strains with increased disease-causing capacity. Estimated dates for these events, which predate the scarlet fever outbreak by decades, are provided for the emm12 scarlet fever strains from Hong Kong (data from [Reference Davies50]).

In addition to ssa, the majority of the scarlet fever outbreak strains from China and Hong Kong also harboured an integrative conjugative element encoding resistance to the antibiotics tetracycline, erythromycin and clindamycin [Reference Davies50, Reference Tse52]. This element was not found in the UK scarlet fever isolates and likely reflects differences in prescribing characteristics in these regions. However, the presence of antibiotic resistance determinants in scarlet fever isolates from China and Hong Kong does raise the intriguing possibility that their selection by antibiotic use may have led to an increased prevalence prior to the onset of the outbreak in 2011, and potentially contributed to the magnitude of this outbreak.

Unfortunately, while considerable progress has been made in characterising the GAS strains responsible for the regional scarlet fever epidemics in Asia and the UK, the underlying trigger for these epidemics remains to be determined. The gene encoding SSA is the only genetic element common to these outbreaks, but is not unique to scarlet fever isolates and was circulating in GAS isolates long before these outbreaks started. It has long been known that only a proportion of a given population is susceptible to scarlet fever [Reference Dick and Dick56], and available evidence to date suggests that underlying co-infection and/or changes in host immune status might contribute to susceptibility to this disease. Uncovering this unknown factor remains a research priority in order to prevent the emergence of scarlet fever in other geographical regions.

Summary/conclusions and unanswered questions

Despite the gradual decline of disease attributed to GAS in industrialised countries over the last several decades, the ongoing burden in developing countries and recent increases in individual disease manifestations in industrialised countries emphasise why GAS infections remain a significant global health problem. This review highlights how new GAS strains with increased fitness account for an upsurge of invasive GAS and scarlet fever infections in recent years. However, unique features associated with each of these diseases do not follow a single theme. Individual GAS clones are responsible for iGAS infections due to M1T1 and emm89 strains, while emm3 iGAS infections and scarlet fever are caused by multiclonal strains. Furthermore, the unknown role of non-GAS factors is highlighted by the emergence of scarlet fever outbreaks long after the expansion of the responsible GAS strains. In recent years, whole genome sequencing has provided an excellent description of the genetic changes that have accompanied disease increases, while also highlighting that these changes often differ between emm types. We are only beginning to understand the complex interplay of newly acquired genetic elements and altered expression of regulatory genes associated with disease. Whole genome sequencing remains an important tool for mapping emerging GAS strains and highlights genetic signatures that should be monitored. However, further experimentation is urgently needed to describe the pathogenic mechanisms of resurgent GAS infections and to reveal new strategies for the monitoring and treatment of these diseases. Finally, diseases that predominate in socio-economically disadvantaged populations remain very poorly understood. Diseases such as ARF and Acute Post-Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis remain a massive problem in socio-economically disadvantaged populations globally [Reference Carapetis2], yet the pathogenesis of these diseases is controversial (for reviews, see [Reference Walker1, Reference Carapetis57Reference Tandon59]), and we still do not know how to identify the GAS strains that trigger these sequelae. As they are responsible for most of the GAS global disease burden, elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms of these diseases will be essential for the design of diagnostic tests and of safe and effective vaccines.

Acknowledgements

TCB is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)-funded ‘Improving Health Outcomes in the Tropical North: A multidisciplinary collaboration (Hot North; APP1131932)’. ACB is supported by an NHMRC early career fellowship (APP1088735).

Conflict of interest

None

References

1.Walker, MJ et al. (2014) Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of Group A Streptococcus. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 27, 264301.Google Scholar
2.Carapetis, JR et al. (2005) The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 5, 685694.Google Scholar
3.Steer, AC et al. (2009) Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 9, 611616.Google Scholar
4.Musser, JM and Shelburne, SA III (2009) A decade of molecular pathogenomic analysis of group A Streptococcus. Journal of Clinical Investigation 119, 24552463.Google Scholar
5.Ralph, AP and Carapetis, JR (2013) Group A streptococcal diseases and their global burden. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 368, 127.Google Scholar
6.Cliff, AD et al. (1997) The importance of long-term records in public health surveillance: the US weekly sanitary reports, 1888–1912, revisited. Journal of Public Health Medicine 19, 7684.Google Scholar
7.Quinn, RW (1989) Comprehensive review of morbidity and mortality trends for rheumatic fever, streptococcal disease, and scarlet fever: the decline of rheumatic fever. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 11, 928953.Google Scholar
8.Radcliffe, JN (1867) On the prevalence, distribution, and limitation of scarlet fever in England. Transactions Epidemiological Society of London 2, 262277.Google Scholar
9.Lamagni, T et al. (2018) Resurgence of scarlet fever in England, 2014–16: a population-based surveillance study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 18, 180187.Google Scholar
10.Steer, AC (2015) Historical aspects of rheumatic fever. Journal of Paediatric Child Health 51, 2127.Google Scholar
11.May, PJ, Bowen, AC and Carapetis, JR (2016) The inequitable burden of group A streptococcal diseases in Indigenous Australians. The Medical Journal of Australia 205, 201203.Google Scholar
12.Carapetis, JR et al. (1999) Clinical and epidemiological features of group A streptococcal bacteraemia in a region with hyperendemic superficial streptococcal infection. Epidemiology & Infection 122, 5965.Google Scholar
13.Kaplan, EL (1991) The resurgence of group A streptococcal infections and their sequelae. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 10, 5557.Google Scholar
14.Nelson, GE et al. (2016) Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infections in the United States, 2005–2012. Clinical Infectious Diseases 63, 478486.Google Scholar
15.Gherardi, G, Vitali, LA and Creti, R (2018) Prevalent emm types among invasive GAS in Europe and North America since year 2000. Frontiers in Public Health 6, 59.Google Scholar
16.O'Grady, KA et al. (2007) The epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal disease in Victoria, Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia 186, 565569.Google Scholar
17.Luca-Harari, B et al. (2009) Clinical and microbiological characteristics of severe Streptococcus pyogenes disease in Europe. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47, 11551165.Google Scholar
18.Chatellier, S et al. (2000) Genetic relatedness and superantigen expression in group A Streptococcus serotype M1 isolates from patients with severe and nonsevere invasive diseases. Infection and Immunity 68, 35233534.Google Scholar
19.Sumby, P et al. (2005) Evolutionary origin and emergence of a highly successful clone of serotype M1 group A Streptococcus involved multiple horizontal gene transfer events. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 192, 771782.Google Scholar
20.Maamary, PG et al. (2012) Tracing the evolutionary history of the pandemic group A streptococcal M1T1 clone. The FASEB Journal 26, 46754684.Google Scholar
21.Nasser, W et al. (2014) Evolutionary pathway to increased virulence and epidemic group A Streptococcus disease derived from 3,615 genome sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, E1768E1776.Google Scholar
22.Chochua, S et al. (2017) Population and whole genome sequence based characterization of invasive group A streptococci recovered in the United States during 2015. MBio 8, e01422-17.Google Scholar
23.Timmer, AM et al. (2009) Streptolysin O promotes group A Streptococcus immune evasion by accelerated macrophage apoptosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 862871.Google Scholar
24.Chandrasekaran, S and Caparon, MG (2016) The NADase-negative variant of the Streptococcus pyogenes Toxin NAD(+) Glycohydrolase induces JNK1-mediated programmed cellular necrosis. MBio 7, e02215-15.Google Scholar
25.Madden, JC, Ruiz, N and Caparon, M (2001) Cytolysin-mediated translocation (CMT): a functional equivalent of type III secretion in gram-positive bacteria. Cell 104, 143152.Google Scholar
26.Riddle, DJ, Bessen, DE and Caparon, MG (2010) Variation in Streptococcus pyogenes NAD+ glycohydrolase is associated with tissue tropism. Journal of Bacteriology 192, 37353746.Google Scholar
27.Chandrasekaran, S et al. (2013) Analysis of polymorphic residues reveals distinct enzymatic and cytotoxic activities of the Streptococcus pyogenes NAD+ glycohydrolase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, 2006420075.Google Scholar
28.Zhu, L et al. (2015) A molecular trigger for intercontinental epidemics of group A Streptococcus. Journal of Clinical Investigation 125, 35453559.Google Scholar
29.Kline, JB and Collins, CM (1996) Analysis of the superantigenic activity of mutant and allelic forms of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A. Infection and Immunity 64, 861869.Google Scholar
30.Kasper, KJ et al. (2014) Bacterial superantigens promote acute nasopharyngeal infection by Streptococcus pyogenes in a human MHC Class II-dependent manner. PLoS Pathogens 10, e1004155.Google Scholar
31.Zeppa, JJ et al. (2017) Nasopharyngeal infection by Streptococcus pyogenes requires superantigen-responsive Vbeta-specific T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 1022610231.Google Scholar
32.Cole, JN et al. (2011) Molecular insight into invasive group A streptococcal disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9, 724736.Google Scholar
33.Sumby, P et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of group A streptococci reveals a mutation that modulates global phenotype and disease specificity. PLoS Pathogens 2, e5.Google Scholar
34.Buchanan, JT et al. (2006) DNase expression allows the pathogen group A Streptococcus to escape killing in neutrophil extracellular traps. Current Biology 16, 396400.Google Scholar
35.Sumby, P et al. (2005) Extracellular deoxyribonuclease made by group A Streptococcus assists pathogenesis by enhancing evasion of the innate immune response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 16791684.Google Scholar
36.Walker, MJ et al. (2007) DNase Sda1 provides selection pressure for a switch to invasive group A streptococcal infection. Nature Medicine 13, 981985.Google Scholar
37.Feng, W et al. (2016) Contemporary pharyngeal and invasive emm1 and invasive emm12 Group A Streptococcus isolates exhibit similar in vivo selection for CovRS mutants in mice. PLoS ONE 11, e0162742.Google Scholar
38.Miller, EW et al. (2015) Regulatory rewiring confers serotype-specific hyper-virulence in the human pathogen group A Streptococcus. Molecular Microbiology 98, 473489.Google Scholar
39.Beres, SB et al. (2010) Molecular complexity of successive bacterial epidemics deconvoluted by comparative pathogenomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 43714376.Google Scholar
40.Beres, SB et al. (2004) Genome-wide molecular dissection of serotype M3 group A Streptococcus strains causing two epidemics of invasive infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 1183311838.Google Scholar
41.Beres, SB et al. (2006) Molecular genetic anatomy of inter- and intraserotype variation in the human bacterial pathogen group A Streptococcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 70597064.Google Scholar
42.Al-Shahib, A et al. (2016) Emergence of a novel lineage containing a prophage in emm/M3 group A Streptococcus associated with upsurge in invasive disease in the UK. Microbial Genomics 2, e000059.Google Scholar
43.Afshar, B et al. (2017) Enhanced nasopharyngeal infection and shedding associated with an epidemic lineage of emm3 group A Streptococcus. Virulence 8, 13901400.Google Scholar
44.Beres, SB et al. (2017) Genome sequence analysis of emm89 Streptococcus pyogenes strains causing infections in Scotland, 2010–2016. Journal of Medical Microbiology 66, 17651773.Google Scholar
45.Shea, PR et al. (2011) Group A Streptococcus emm gene types in pharyngeal isolates, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17, 20102017.Google Scholar
46.Turner, CE et al. (2015) Emergence of a new highly successful acapsular group A Streptococcus clade of genotype emm89 in the United Kingdom. MBio 6, e00622.Google Scholar
47.Flores, AR et al. (2012) Human disease isolates of serotype M4 and M22 group A Streptococcus lack genes required for hyaluronic acid capsule biosynthesis. MBio 3, e00413-12.Google Scholar
48.Cole, JN et al. (2010) M protein and hyaluronic acid capsule are essential for in vivo selection of covRS mutations characteristic of invasive serotype M1T1 group A Streptococcus. MBio 1, e00191-10.Google Scholar
49.Wong, SS and Yuen, KY (2012) Streptococcus pyogenes and re-emergence of scarlet fever as a public health problem. Emerging Microbes & Infections 1, e2.Google Scholar
50.Davies, MR et al. (2015) Emergence of scarlet fever Streptococcus pyogenes emm12 clones in Hong Kong is associated with toxin acquisition and multidrug resistance. Nature Genetics 47, 8487.Google Scholar
51.Park, DW et al. (2017) Incidence and characteristics of scarlet fever, South Korea, 2008–2015. Emerging Infectious Diseases 23, 658661.Google Scholar
52.Tse, H et al. (2012) Molecular characterization of the 2011 Hong Kong scarlet fever outbreak. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 206, 341351.Google Scholar
53.You, Y et al. (2018) Scarlet fever epidemic in China caused by Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M12: epidemiologic and molecular analysis. EBioMedicine 28, 128135.Google Scholar
54.Chalker, V et al. (2017) Genome analysis following a national increase in Scarlet Fever in England 2014. BMC Genomics 18, 224.Google Scholar
55.Ben Zakour, NL et al. (2015) Transfer of scarlet fever-associated elements into the group A Streptococcus M1T1 clone. Scientific Reports 5, 15877.Google Scholar
56.Dick, GF and Dick, GH (1924) A skin test for susceptibility to scarlet fever. The Journal of the American Medical Association 82, 265266.Google Scholar
57.Carapetis, JR et al. (2016) Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2, 15084.Google Scholar
58.Bright, PD, Mayosi, BM and Martin, WJ (2016) An immunological perspective on rheumatic heart disease pathogenesis: more questions than answers. Heart 102, 15271532.Google Scholar
59.Tandon, R et al. (2013) Revisiting the pathogenesis of rheumatic fever and carditis. Nature Reviews Cardiology 10, 171177.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Evolutionary pathway of M1T1, emm3 and emm89 GAS strains with increased capacity to cause iGAS infections. For each example, multiple genetic events involving prophage acquisition, recombination and/or point mutations have resulted in contemporary strains with increased disease-causing capacity. Estimated dates for these events are provided for the M1T1 iGAS clone (data from [21]).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Evolutionary pathway of GAS strains with increased capacity to cause Scarlet Fever. Prophage acquisition of the superantigen SSA has resulted in contemporary strains with increased disease-causing capacity. Estimated dates for these events, which predate the scarlet fever outbreak by decades, are provided for the emm12 scarlet fever strains from Hong Kong (data from [50]).