Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:12:11.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Faecal contamination of water and fingertip-rinses as a method for evaluating the effect of low-cost water supply and sanitation activities on faeco-oral disease transmission. II. A hygiene intervention study in rural north-east Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. V. Pinfold
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An intervention study was developed from risk-factors associated with faecooral transmission, based on the levels of contamination in stored water and fingertip-rinses from households in rural north-east Thailand. This was designed to improve: (a) handwashing, particularly before cooking/eating and after defecation; (b) washing dishes immediately after use. Verbal messages were administered to two intervention groups, one also received a plastic container with a tap to assist these activities. Indicators of compliance were the direct observation of soaking dishes and the presence of faecal streptococci from fingertip-rinses; the main outcome indicator was Escherichia coli contamination of stored water. The intervention group receiving the container was significantly better than the control for indicators of compliance (P < 0·001 and P < 0·01) and its stored water was significantly less contaminated (P < 0·001). There was no significant improvement to the other intervention group, although some features of the intervention had clearly been made available to the control group. Humidity was significantly correlated with fingertip contamination (r = 0·2; P < 0·001) and with the peak of reported diarrhoea around the beginning of the rainy season.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Snyder, JD, Merson, MH. The magnitude of the global problem of acute diarrhoeal disease. Bull WHO 1982; 60: 605–13.Google Scholar
2.Clemens, JD, Stanton, BF. An educational intervention of altering water-sanitation behaviours to reduce childhood diarrhea in urban Bangladesh: I. Application of the case-control method for development of an intervention. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 284–91.Google Scholar
3.Pinfold, JV. Faecal contamination of water and fingertip-rinses as a method for evaluating the effect of low-cost water supply and sanitation activities on faeco-oral disease transmission I. A case study in rural north-east Thailand. Epidemiol Infect 1990: 105: 363375.Google Scholar
4.Black, RE, Brown, KH, Becker, S, Alim, ARM, Merson, MH. Contamination of weaning foods and transmission of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea in children in rural Bangladesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1982; 76: 259–64.Google Scholar
5.Report 71. The bacteriological examination of water supplies. London: HMSO Publications, 1984.Google Scholar
6.Stanton, BF, Clemens, JD. An educational intervention for altering water-sanitation behaviours to reduce childhood diarrhea in urban Bangladesh: II. A randomised trial to assess the impact of the intervention of hygienic behaviours and rates of diarrhea. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 292301.Google Scholar
7.Pinfold, JV. Assessment of the effects of low-cost water supply and sanitation initiatives on faeco-oral disease transmission [Dissertation]. Leeds, England: University of Leeds, 1989. 272 pp.Google Scholar
8.Echeverria, P, Seriwatana, J, Taylor, DN, Yanggratoke, S, Tirapat, C. A comparative study of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Shigella, Aeromonas, and Vibrio as etiologies of diarrhea in northeast Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1985; 34: 547–54.Google Scholar