Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:00:36.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting warmth comfort and stuffiness in domestic rooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One object of the investigation was to determine the ideal contributions to warmth comfort in small ‘domestic’ rooms of air heating and radiation. It was soon found that in rooms heated by fires, subjects usually complained of cold backs when the equivalent temperature was in the region of 60–65° F., the accepted standard for buildings heated by convection, and preferred equivalent temperatures above 70° F.

Since large-scale trials, using many observers, were clearly necessary, the reliability of 5 min. test periods was studied; these short periods were proved reliable so long as the subject had previously been in a comfortable room for an hour or so.

It was found necessary, in rooms heated by fires, to treat separately the side of the subject facing the fire and remote from it. The cooler side must be exposed to an equivalent temperature not much less than 65° F., while radiation falling on the warm side is to be regarded as a very desirable, but nonessential, bonus. These conclusions were confirmed by field work in the subjects' own homes.

The eupatheoscope and globe thermometer were modified to enable conditions acting on the two sides of the body to be assessed separately.

The extent to which radiation acting on the front of the body could compensate for a cold back to produce what was called ‘minimum comfort’ was also studied. It was shown that down to back equivalent temperatures of about 56° F. an increase of 2° in front equivalent temperature will compensate for a fall of 1° in back equivalent temperature, but below 56° F. compensation fails.

The physical basis of sensations of stuffiness and freshness were also investigated. Throughout these experiments care was taken to ensure that the subjects were neither too hot nor too cold. In these conditions, only two factors appear to be important. First, the air temperature should be as low as possible. To obtain warmth comfort with a low air temperature some high temperature source of radiation is generally necessary. The peak wave-length of the radiation emitted by the fire is also of great importance, a striking change in the personal sensations occurring, for example, as the wave-length increases from 2 to 3μ. In general, those wavelengths which are absorbed in the outer layers of the skin cause sensations of stuffiness, and those which are not give rise to feelings of freshness. Peaks at 3, 4·1 and 4·7 μ should therefore be avoided in the design of gas and electric fires.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

References

REFERENCES

Bedford, T. (1930). Rep. Industr. Hlth Res. Bd, Lond., no. 58.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. (1936). Rep. Industr. Hlth Res. Bd, Lond., no. 76.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. (1946). Heat. Vent. Engr. 20, 51.Google Scholar
Dufton, A. F. (1930). Phil. Mag. 9, 958.Google Scholar
Dufton, A. F. (1932). Tech. Pap. Build. Res., Lond., no. 13.Google Scholar
Fishenden, M. (1926). J. Roy. Soc. Arts, 74, 451.Google Scholar
Hill, Sir L. (1939). Brit. Med. J. 1, 977.Google Scholar
Houghten, F. C. & Yaglou, C. P. (1923). Trans. Amer. Soc. Heat. Vent. Engrs, 26, 163, 361.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. J. (1933). Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 142, 598.Google Scholar
Vernon, H. M. (1932). J. Industr. Hyg. 14.Google Scholar
Yarnold, K. W. (1940). J. Inst. Heat. Vent. Engrs, 09.Google Scholar