Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:55:24.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the formation and oxidation of sulphides in a polluted estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. B. Wheatland
A. B. Wheatland
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Factors affecting the formation and destruction of sulphide in the Thames Estuary have been discussed. Measurements of oxidation-reduction potentials show that the effect of oxygen in the water on conditions in deposits of mud is limited to the surface layer. The rate of formation of sulphide increases with temperature, doubling approximately for each 10° C. rise. Reduction of sulphate to sulphide will occur at temperatures as low as 5° C., but even at 25° C. is inhibited by traces of dissolved oxygen. Mud in suspension in the estuary can produce as much sulphide as compact layers of similar mud which might be more anaerobic.

Oxidation of sulphide in the Thames Estuary is shown to be of a purely chemical nature; the rate of oxidation, when oxygen is present, is increased by the presence of suspended matter and iron. In the Thames Estuary, however, the rate is limited by the rate at which oxygen enters the water.

Much of the experimental work described in this paper was carried out by Miss A. Laird, Mr A. E. Sutton and Mr R. B. Peel of this Laboratory. The paper is published by permission of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1954 , pp. 194 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

REFERENCES

Aleshina, W. L. (1938). Decomposition of chitin by sulphate-reducing bacteria and changes in oxidation-reduction conditions during the process of reduction of sulphates. Microbiology, Moscow, 7, 850. (Quoted by ZoBell, C. E. & Rittenberg, S. C. (1948).)Google Scholar
Debyser, J. (1952). Le pH de la pellicule superficielle d'une vase fluvio marine. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 234, 864.Google Scholar
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (1938). Estuary of the River Mersey. Tech. Pap. Wat. Pollut. Res., Lond., no. 7. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (1952). Rep. Wat. Pollut. Res. Bd., Lond. 1952. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Jahn, K. F., Kröller, E., Shin, I. & Kunt, A. (1948). Unpublished work reported in Fiat Review of German Science, Inorganic Chemistry, Part 1, p. 175.Google Scholar
Krebs, H. A. (1929). Über die Wirkung der Schwermetalle auf die Autoxidation der Alkali-sulphide und des Schwefelwasserstoff. Biochem. Z. 204, 343.Google Scholar
Meunier, L. & Kapp, M. (1931). Oxydation par l'air, des solutions étendues de sulfure de sodium. Cuir tech. 20, 364.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. A. & Preddy, W. S. (1952). Discharge of sewage and industrial wastes to estuaries. J. R. sanit. Inst. 72, 524.Google ScholarPubMed
ZoBell, C. E. & Rittenberg, S. C. (1948). Sulphate-reducing bacteria in marine sediments. J. Mar. Res. 7, 602.Google Scholar