Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:16:43.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on the spread of colds: 1. Laboratory studies on the dispersal of nasal secretion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. E. Buckland  and
D. A. J. Tyrrell
F. E. Buckland
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Common Cold Research Unit, Harvard Hospital, Salisbury, Wilts
D. A. J. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Common Cold Research Unit, Harvard Hospital, Salisbury, Wilts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An attempt has been made to study quantitatively the mechanisms by which infectious materials may enter the body by the upper respiratory tract and be shed during a cold.

The rapid clearance of tracers, spores of B. mycoides and bacteriophage type T3, has been measured after adding them in small drops to the nose, conjunctiva and mouth.

Tracers placed in the nose pass rapidly down the throat, but are found in only small amounts in the saliva. They are dispersed by blowing the nose and, more efficiently, by sneezing. Nearly all are shed as coarse droplets. About 0·1% are shed in droplets small enough to remain airborne and just over half of these are in the size range likely to be trapped in the upper respiratory tract. The droplets are apparently formed mainly in the nose. The larger amounts of droplets formed in the mouth carried relatively few infectious particles.

Testing by experiments in a model system it was concluded that most of the coarse droplets produced by a sneeze or by an experimental spray fall rapidly to the floor. A few of the larger droplets were trapped on a moistened microscope slide intended to mimic the possible trapping of droplets on the conjunctive. The spores in these represented only a small proportion of those found in droplets which remained airborne and were collected by an air sampler.

We wish to thank Miss P. D. Ball for technical assistance and Dr J. E. Lovelock for helpful discussion in the early stages of this work. We are also grateful to Sir Victor Negus and Dr B. Wyke for discussing the physiology of the nose with us, and to Mr K. R. May for his advice on methods of air sampling. The air samplers were loaned by the Microbiological Research Establishment, Porton, and the photographs taken by the Chemical Defence Experimental Establishment, Porton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1964 , pp. 365 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Badger, G. F., Dingle, J. H., Feller, A. E., Hodges, R. G., Jordan, W. S. & Rammelkamp, C. H. (1953). A study of illness in a group of Cleveland families. V. Introductions and secondary attack rates as indices of exposure to common respiratory diseases in the community. Amer. J. Hyg. 58, 179.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B. & Lidwell, O. M. (1941). Sneezing and the spread of infection. Lancet, ii, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguid, J. P. (1945). The numbers and the site of origin of the droplets expelled during respiratory activities. Edinb. med. J. 52, 385.Google Scholar
Hamburger, M. Jnr., Green, Margaret J. & Hamburger, Virginia G. (1945). The problems of the ‘dangerous carrier’ of haemolytic streptococci. J. infect. Dis. 77, 68, 96.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1964). The transmission of respiratory infections. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 57, 221.Google ScholarPubMed
Hare, R. & Mackenzie, Doroth M. (1946). The source and transmission of nasopharyngeal infections due to certain bacteria and viruses. Brit. med. J. i, 864.Google Scholar
Hare, R. & Thomas, C. G. A. (1956). The transmission of staphylococcus aureus. Brit. med. J. ii, 840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennison, M. W. (1942). Atomisation of mouth and nose secretions into the air as revealed by high speed photography. Summ. Proc. Amer. Ass. Adv. Sci. 17, 106.Google Scholar
Landahl, H. D. & Black, S. (1947). Penetration of airborne particulates through the human nose. J. industr. Hyg. 29, 269.Google ScholarPubMed
Liddell, H. F. & Wootten, N. W. (1957). The detection and measurement of water droplets. Quart. J. R. M. Soc. 83, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. & Sommerville, T. (1951). Observations on the incidence and distribution of the common cold in a rural community during 1948 and 1949. J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 365.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E., Porterfield, J. S., Roden, A. T., Sommerville, T. & Andrews, C. H. (1952). Further studies on the natural transmission of the common cold. Lancet, ii, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, K. R. (1945). The cascade impactor. J. sci. Instrum. 22, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, K. R. & Druett, H. A. (1953). The preimpinger, a selective aerosol sampler. Brit. J. industr. Med. 10, 142.Google ScholarPubMed
Negus, Sir Victor.(1958). The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Nose and Paranasal sinuses. Edinburgh and London: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Noble, W. C., Lidwell, O. M. & Kingston, D. (1963). The size distribution of airborne particles carrying microorganisms. J. Hyg., Camb., 61, 385.Google ScholarPubMed
Proetz, A. W. (1953). Essays on the Applied Physiology of the Nose (2nd ed.). St Louis: Annals Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rivera, J. A. (1962). Cilia, Ciliated Epithelium and Ciliary Activity. Oxford, London, New York, Paris: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Wells, W. F. (1956). Airborne Contagion and Air Hygiene. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. (1960). Intramural spread of bacteria and viruses in human populations. Amer. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed