Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:53:41.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on Staphylococcus food poisoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. C. Minett
F. C. Minett
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Animal Pathology, Royal Veterinary College, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Feeding tests on monkeys (Macacus rhesus), dogs and cats are unsatisfactory for detecting the presence of enterotoxin, owing to the variable susceptibility of these animals by the oral route.

2. Using Dolman's method, in which the material is injected intra-peritoneally into kittens, the production of enterotoxin has been demonstrated by: (a) sixteen out of thirty-eight strains of Staph. aureus, isolated from cases of acute or chronic mastitis or from normal udder milk; (b) four out of five strains of Bact. coli, mostly from calves with “white scours”. No enterotoxin was obtained from fifteen strains of Str. agalactiae from mastitis in cows.

3. The formation of enterotoxin under natural conditions has been observed: (a) In udder milk seeded with Staph. aureus or naturally contaminated with that organism and stored at atmospheric temperatures (18 and 22°C.). The substance remains active in cheese prepared from such milk. (b) In layer cake made with cream naturally contaminated with Staph. aureus.

4. A small outbreak of poisoning due to potted meat paste was shown to be caused by a non-haemolytic Staphylococcus.

5. A few feeding experiments on man with milk or cream, in which food-poisoning staphylococci had grown, were negative, but on one occasion a Staphylococcus from a case of mastitis yielded a culture filtrate which caused symptoms of food poisoning.

6. Enterotoxin has the following properties. It is resistant to heat (95°C., 30 min.), to low concentrations of formalin sufficient to destroy the haemolytic toxin, to acid (pH 5·0), and to rennet, but is destroyed by trypsin.

It diffuses freely into the culture medium but only slightly through collodion. It is antigenic. Its properties are such that enterotoxin can be classed as a bacterial exotoxin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , September 1938 , pp. 623 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

References

REFERENCES

Barber, M. A. (1914). Philipp. J. Sci. 9, 515.Google Scholar
Crabtree, J. A. & Litterer, W. (1934). Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 24, 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dack, G. M., Woolpert, O., Noble, I. & Halliday, E. G. (1931). J. prev. Med. 5, 391.Google Scholar
Davison, E., Dack, G. M. & Cary, W. E. (1938). J. infect. Dis. 62, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, C. E. (1934). J. infect. Dis. 55, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, C. E. & Wilson, R. J. (1938). Canad. publ. Hlth J. 29, 35.Google Scholar
Dolman, C. E., Wilson, R. J. & Cockcroft, W. H. (1936). Canad. publ. Hlth J. 27, 489.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1930). J. Amer. med. Ass. 94, 1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. & Burrows, W. (1934). J. infect. Dis. 55, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. & Burrows, W. (1934 a). Amer. J. Hyg. 20, 604.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O. & Burrows, W. (1935). J. infect. Dis. 57, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathe, (1937). Z. Bakt. 140, 71.Google Scholar
Kelly, F. C. & Dack, G. M. (1936). Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 26, 1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, W. (1917). J. Lab. clin. Med. 2, 761.Google Scholar
Ramsey, R. J. & Tracy, P. H. (1931). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 28, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, H. J. & Grubb, T. C. (1936). J. infect. Dis. 58, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, H. J. & Grubb, T. C. (1937). Canad. publ. Hlth J. 28, 229.Google Scholar
Tanner, F. W. & Ramsey, R. J. (1932). Amer. J. med. Sci. 184, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar