Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:47:12.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental aspergillosis in mice: aspects of resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Nuffield Institute of Comparative Medicine, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London N.W.1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Intravenous inoculation of Aspergillus fumigatus spores was used to study experimentally induced and natural resistance. Slight resistance resulted in increased survival time and higher resistance produced in addition a decreased infection rate.

Sublethal doses of living spores gave significant protection against challenge 3 weeks later, but large doses of heat-killed spores had no demonstrable effect.

Mice from one source showed a single, dramatic decrease in dose response to a deep-frozen strain of the organism over a period of 34 months. The dose response initially resembled that described by Scholer (1959) in which one million spores killed the majority of mice. The change was almost certainly due to an increase in resistance of the mice due to environmental factors, and the resistance was probably also effective against other strains of the organism. Although not proved, it seemed likely that the resistance was due to increased natural contact with A. fumigatus or related fungi. Possibly for a similar reason, mice of the same stock bred on different premises differed in their susceptibility to infection. The results indicated that environmental resistance-producing factors may have been operating simultaneously on a number of premises housing laboratory animals in south-east England. These findings may have significance in relation to the occurrence of natural aspergillosis of mammals and birds.

Of five A. fumigatus strains, four were of closely similar virulence; the fifth strain grew more slowly in vitro and was somewhat less virulent. Isolates from mice which died sporadically after small doses of spores were of no greater virulence than the inoculated strain. Although the susceptibility of mice aged 3 weeks was not uniform under all conditions, such animals were less resistant than young adult mice. Mice from six different sources showed only slight differences in susceptibility between each other, or from mice known to have developed a natural resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Asakura, S., Nakagawa, S., Masui, M. & Yasuda, J. (1962). Immunological studies of aspergillosis in birds. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 18, 249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austwick, P. K. C. (1962). The presence of Aspergillus fumigatus in the lungs of dairy cows. Laboratory Investigation 11, 1065.Google ScholarPubMed
Austwick, P. K. C. (1965). In The Genus Aspergillus (ed. Raper, K. B. and Fennell, D. I.), p. 82. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Baruah, H. K. (1961). The air spora of a cowshed. Journal of General Microbiology 25, 483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, S. & Friedman, L. (1967). Experimental study of the pathogenicity of aspergilli for mice. Journal of Bacteriology 94, 928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, P. H. & Lacey, M. E. (1963 a). Mycological examination of dust from mouldy hay associated with farmer's lung disease. Journal of General Microbiology 30, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, P. H. & Lacey, M. E. (1963 b). Liberation of spores from mouldy hay. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 46, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrici, A. T. (1939). An endotoxin from Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Immunology 36, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, J. W. (1952). Nutritional experiments in laboratory animals. Journal of the Animal Technicians Association 2, 7.Google Scholar
Hyde, H. A., Richards, M. & Williams, D. A. (1956). Allergy to mould spores in Britain. British Medical Journal i, 886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. J., Munday, B. L. & Hartley, W. J. (1965). Bovine mycotic abortion and pneumonia. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 13, 76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimeš, B. & Rosa, L. (1964). Die Altersresistenz von Klüken gegenüber Aspergillus fumigatus. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 77, 125.Google Scholar
Kong, Y. C. M. & Levine, H. B. (1967). Experimentally induced immunity in the mycoses. Bacteriological Reviews 31, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, J. & Lacey, M. E. (1964). Spore concentrations in the air of farm buildings. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 47, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W. C. & Clayton, Y. M. (1963). Fungi in the air of hospital wards. Journal of General Microbiology 32, 397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Meara, D. C. & Chute, H. L. (1959). Aspergillosis experimentally produced in hatching chicks. Avian Diseases 3, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepys, J. (1969). Hypersensitivity Diseases of the Lungs due to Fungi and Organic Dusts. New York: Karger, Basel.Google ScholarPubMed
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. (1938). A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. American Journal of Hygiene 27, 493.Google Scholar
Scholer, H. J. (1959). Experimentelle Aspergillose der Maus (Aspergillus fumigatus) und ihre chemotherapeutische Beeinflussung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Pathologie und Bakteriologie 22, 564.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1969). The search for protective antigens. British Medical Bulletin 25, 126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilden, E. B., Hatton, E. H., Freeman, S. & Williamson, W. M. (1957). Studies of aspergilli from captive birds. Bacteriological Proceedings, 144.Google Scholar
Tilden, E. B., Hatton, E. H., Freeman, S., Williamson, W. M. & Koenig, V. L. (1961). Preparation and properties of the endotoxins of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 14, 325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed