Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:54:02.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of methods of applying oil to bedclothes and practical application of the selected method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. Leslie
Affiliation:
Manchester Oil Refinery Limited
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thomas & Van den Ende (1941) and Puck and his collaborators (Puck, Hamburger, Robertson & Hurst, 1945; Puck, Robertson, Wise, Loosli & Lemon, 1946) have shown that the application of small amounts of oil to bedclothes reduces the quantities of dust and bacteria liberated during bedmaking. Joyce Wright in her first investigation (Wright, Cruickshank & Gunn, 1944) found that oiling bedclothes was, consequently, effective in reducing the incidence of cross-infection, but this was not confirmed in her later work (Wright, Begg & Smellie, 1947), or by Krugman & Ward (1951). Barnard (1952), however, has recently shown that cross-infection can possibly arise by interchange of bacteria in blankets during laundering. Oiling of bedclothes may, therefore, be a very useful hygiene measure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Barnard, H. F. (1952). The sterilization of wool fabrics. Brit. med. J. i, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, C. H. & Weatherburn, A. S. (1945). Chemical aspects of the application of dust-laying oils to wool. Canad. J. Res. 23F, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, F. C., Powney, J. & Edwards, C. W. (1944). New technique for the application of dust-laying oils to hospital bed-clothes. Brit. med. J. i, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, S. & Ward, R. (1951). Air sterilization in an infant ward: effect of triethylene glycol vapor and dust suppressive measures on the respiratory cross-infection rate. J. Amer. med. Ass. 145, 775.Google Scholar
Puck, T. T., Hamburger, M., Robertson, O. H. & Hurst, Valerie (1945). The effect of triethylene glycol vapor on air-borne Beta hemolytic streptococci in hospital wards: the combined action of glycol vapor and dust control measures. J. infect. Dis. 76, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puck, T. T., Robertson, O. H., Wise, H., Loosli, C. G. & Lemon, H. M. (1946). Oil treatment of bed-clothes for the control of dust-borne infection. (1) Principles underlying the development and use of a satisfactory oil-in-water emulsion. (2) The use of ‘Triton’ oil emulsion (T-13) as a routine laundry procedure. Amer. J. Hyg. 43, 91, 105.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C. & Van Den Ende, M. (1941). Treatment of bed-clothes with dust-laying oils. Use of oil-in-water emulsions. Lancet, ii, 755.Google Scholar
U.S. Navy Medical Research Unit NO. 1. (1946). An improved method for quantitative impregnation of textiles with germicidal emulsifiable oils. Science, 104, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, , Joyce, , Begg, N. D. & Smellie, Elspeth W. (1947). Dust control in measles wards with a note on sulphadiazine prophylaxis. Brit. med. J. i, 209.Google Scholar
Wright, , Joyce, , Cruickshank, R. & Gunn, W. (1944). The control of dust-borne streptococcal infection in measles wards. Brit. med. J. i, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar