Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:39:03.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of brodifacoum against T. indica, M. hurrianae and R. rattus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

R. P. Mathur  and
I. Prakash
R. P. Mathur
Affiliation:
Coordinating and Monitoring Centre for Rodent Research and Training, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur–342 003 (Raj.) India
I. Prakash
Affiliation:
Coordinating and Monitoring Centre for Rodent Research and Training, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur–342 003 (Raj.) India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Brodifacoum was evaluated in the laboratory against the two gerbils, Tatera indica and Meriones hurrianae and the house rat, Rattus rattus. The acute oral LD50 for these rodents was found to be 0·10 mg/kg, 0·083 mg/kg and 0·77 mg/kg respectively. Feeding tests with 0·002% and 0·005% brodifacoum produced a 100% mortality after a 3-day feeding period in the gerbils and after a 4-day period in R. rattus. The anticoagulant is toxic at both the concentrations to all three species but is less palatable in comparison to plain baits. Results of this laboratory evaluation indicates that 0·002% brodifacoum-treated bait can be effectively used against T. indica, M. hurrianae and R. rattus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

Barnett, S. A. & Prakash, I. (1975). Rodents of Economic Importance in India, pp. 1–175. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. E., Htun, P. T. & Naing, H. (1980). The susceptibility of Bandicota bengalensis from Rangoon, Burma to several anticoagulant rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene 84, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, G. C., Patel, M. J., Thakore, K. M. & Thakore, M. T. (1979). Preliminary trials with bromadiolone – an anticoagulant rodenticide. Indian Journal of Rodentology 1 (1 & 2) 56–58.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit Analysis, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, J. E. & Redfern, R. (1979). Laboratory tests of seven rodenticides for the control of Mastomys natalensis. Journal of Hygiene 83, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girish, G. K., Singh, Karan & Krishnamurthy, K. (1974). Studies on rodents and their control. Part IX. Susceptibility of Rattus rattus to some anticoagulants. Bulletin of Grain Technology 12, 11–13.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. H. & Rehman, A. B. (1977). The susceptibility of Tatera indica, Nesokia indica and Bandicota bengalensis to three anticoagulant rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene, 78, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, Y. M. (1980). Laboratory evaluation of brodifacoum for the control of the rice field rat, Rattus argentiventer (Robinson & Kloss). Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Rice Research Branch, Information paper no. 13, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Mathur, R. P. & Prakash, I. (1979). Comparative efficacy of three anticoagulant rodenticides on desert rodents. Pest Control (In the Press).Google Scholar
Mathur, R. P. & Prakash, I. (1980 a). Laboratory evaluation of anticoagulant treated baits for the control of the Northern palm squirrel, Funambulus pennanti Wroughton. Journal of Hygiene, 85, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, R. P. & Prakash, I. (1980 b). New food reaction among desert rodents. Saugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 28, 28–30.Google Scholar
Mukthabai, K. & Krishnakumari, M. K. (1976). Responses of Rattus species to anticoagulant poisoning. Comparative Physiology and Ecology 1, 129–135.Google Scholar
Prakash, I. & Jain, A. P. (1971). Bait shyness of two gerbils Tatera indica indica Hardwicke and Meriones hurrianae Jerdon. Annals of Applied Biology 69, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakash, I. & Mathur, R. P. (1979). Efficacy of cholorphacinone in controlling Indian desert rodents. Pesticides 13 (6), 44–46.Google Scholar
Prakash, I., Rana, B. D. & Jain, A. P. (1975). Bait shyness in three species of Rattus. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Zoologie 62, 89–97.Google Scholar
Redfern, R., Gill, J. E. & Hadler, M. R. (1976). Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 77, 419–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehman, A. B. (1979). Effect of difenacoum on Indian gerbils. Pest Control 47 (9), 31.Google Scholar
Tongtavee, K. (1980). Efficacy tests of different rodenticides on some species of rats in Thailand. Proceedings of Ninth Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 143–145. California: Fresno.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1970). Provisional instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of rodents to anticoagulant rodenticides. World Health Organization Technical Report Series no. 443, 140–147.Google Scholar