Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:02.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The epidemiology of measles in Poland: prevalence of measles virus antibodies in the population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2001

W. JANASZEK
Affiliation:
Department of Sera and Vaccine Evaluation, National Institute of Hygiene, Chocimska 24, Warsaw, Poland
W. GUT
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, National Institute of Hygiene, Chocimska 24, Warsaw, Poland
N. J. GAY
Affiliation:
Immunisation Division, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

WHO has adopted a goal of eliminating indigenous measles from the European Region by the year 2007. The strategy focuses on reducing the proportion of susceptible individuals in the population to low levels and maintaining these low levels of susceptibility. Routine vaccination against measles for children aged 13–15 months was introduced in Poland in 1975, and a second dose added in 1991. High coverage (> 95%) is achieved with both doses. In order to assess progress towards measles elimination in Poland, a serological survey was performed to evaluate the impact of vaccination on the susceptibility profile of population. Three thousand residual serum samples from individuals aged 1–30 years were collected from hospitals in six selected voivodeships (administration units) in Poland. These were tested for measles-specific IgG using a commercial ELISA. Overall 4% (120/3000) were negative for measles virus antibody. The highest proportion of negatives (8·2%) occurred among cohorts born 1977–81 – the only cohorts in which susceptibility exceeded the WHO targets. ‘Catch-up’ vaccination strategies should target these cohorts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press